Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May;4(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.012.
The aim of this study was to understand the impact of attenuated plaque on distal embolization during stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Attenuated plaques identified by grayscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) might predict transient deterioration in coronary flow and/or no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
We analyzed clinical, angiographic, and IVUS data from 364 patients (n = 364 infarct-related arteries) enrolled in the randomized HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. No-reflow was final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2 in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Attenuated plaque was hypoechoic or mixed atheroma with ultrasound attenuation without calcification. A mean attenuation score was created by measuring the angle of attenuation each 1 mm, scoring the angle as 1 to 4 (corresponding to <90°, 90° to 180°, 180° to 270°, or 270° to 360°, respectively), summing the scores, and normalizing for analysis length.
Overall, 284 (78.0%) patients had attenuated plaques; no-reflow occurred in 37 (10.2%). Patients with no-reflow had a higher mean attenuation score (median [interquartile range] 2.2 [0.0 to 2.8] vs. 1.3 [0.7 to 1.8], p < 0.001), lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (52.8% [43.2% to 61.5%] vs. 61.4% [52.2% to 68.1%], p = 0.002), and more baseline angiographic thrombus (89.2% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.043) with no differences in post-PCI stent expansion versus patients without no-reflow. Multivariate analysis indicated that mean attenuation score was the strongest predictor of no-reflow. The mean attenuation score that best predicted no-reflow was ≥2 points (90° to 180°, sensitivity of 81.5%, and specificity of 80.5%).
Attenuated plaque was present in three-quarters of patients with AMI. The amount of attenuated plaque strongly correlated with no-reflow; the larger the attenuated plaque, the greater the likelihood of no-reflow. (Dual Arm Factorial Randomized Trial in Patients w/ST Segment Elevation AMI to Compare the Results of Using Anticoagulation With Either Unfractionated Heparin + Routine GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition or Bivalirudin + Bail-out GP IIb/IIIa Inhibition; and Primary Angioplasty with stent implantation with Either a Slow Rate-release Paclitaxel-eluting Stent [TAXUS™] or Uncoated Bare Metal Stent [EXPRESS2™]; NCT00433966).
本研究旨在了解急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者支架植入术中衰减斑块对远端栓塞的影响。
灰阶血管内超声(IVUS)识别的衰减斑块可能预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间冠状动脉血流的短暂恶化和/或无复流。
我们分析了随机 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死再血管化和支架治疗的结果协调)试验中 364 名患者(n = 364 支梗死相关动脉)的临床、血管造影和 IVUS 数据。无复流是指在不存在机械阻塞的情况下,最终血栓溶解心肌梗死(TIMI)血流分级≤2。衰减斑块是指无钙化的低回声或混合性动脉粥样硬化伴超声衰减。通过测量每 1mm 的衰减角度来创建平均衰减评分,将角度评为 1 至 4(分别对应于<90°、90°至 180°、180°至 270°或 270°至 360°),将评分相加,并归一化分析长度。
总体而言,284 名(78.0%)患者存在衰减斑块;37 名(10.2%)患者发生无复流。发生无复流的患者平均衰减评分较高(中位数[四分位距] 2.2 [0.0 至 2.8] vs. 1.3 [0.7 至 1.8],p < 0.001),基线左心室射血分数较低(52.8% [43.2%至 61.5%] vs. 61.4% [52.2%至 68.1%],p = 0.002),基线血管造影血栓更多(89.2% vs. 74.1%,p = 0.043),但支架扩张后与无无复流患者相比无差异。多变量分析表明,平均衰减评分是无复流的最强预测因素。最佳预测无复流的平均衰减评分≥2 分(90°至 180°,敏感性为 81.5%,特异性为 80.5%)。
急性心肌梗死患者中有四分之三存在衰减斑块。衰减斑块的数量与无复流密切相关;衰减斑块越大,无复流的可能性越大。(在 ST 段抬高的急性心肌梗死患者中进行的比较使用抗凝剂与未分级肝素+常规 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制或比伐卢定+挽救性 GP IIb/IIIa 抑制的双重手臂因子随机试验;以及使用紫杉醇洗脱支架[TAXUS™]或无涂层裸金属支架[EXPRESS2™]进行的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和支架植入;NCT00433966)。