Suppr超能文献

锚定瓣与喇叭口端、全覆膜自膨式金属支架预防良性胆道狭窄患者支架迁移的多中心前瞻性对比性初步研究(附视频)

Anchoring flap versus flared end, fully covered self-expandable metal stents to prevent migration in patients with benign biliary strictures: a multicenter, prospective, comparative pilot study (with videos).

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for the management of benign biliary strictures. However, the major limitations of FCSEMSs are frequent migration and removal complications.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this study to compare the antimigration effects, complication rates, and short-term efficacy of 2 FCSEMSs with either an anchoring flap (AF) or a flared end (FE) at the proximal end of the stent.

DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective comparative pilot study.

SETTING

Two tertiary referral centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 43 patients with benign biliary stricture who were candidates for placement of FCSEMSs were assigned to the AF (n = 22) or the FE group (n = 21).

INTERVENTIONS

Predefined duration of placement and removal of FCSEMSs.

RESULTS

After a median period of placement of 6 months (interquartile range 4-6), no patients in the AF group and 33% of patients (7 of 21, 1 in proximal and 6 in distal) in the FE group had stent migration (P = .004). The removal rate of the FCSEMSs was 100% in both groups (per protocol, n = 22 in the AF group and n = 17 in the FE group). Immediate improvement of biliary stricture was 91% (20/22, per protocol) in the AF group and 88% (15/17, per protocol) in the FE group. All stents were removed without difficulty.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term follow-up after the removal of FCSEMSs.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to the antimigration effect of FCSEMSs for benign biliary stricture, the AF design may be superior to the FE. For up to 6 months, both FCSEMSs can be endoscopically removed without complications. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00945516.).

摘要

背景

最近,完全被覆盖的自膨式金属支架(FCSEMS)的放置已被提议作为良性胆道狭窄管理的替代治疗方法。然而,FCSEMS 的主要局限性是频繁的迁移和取出并发症。

目的

我们进行这项研究比较两种近端有锚定瓣(AF)或喇叭口(FE)的 FCSEMS 的抗迁移效果、并发症发生率和短期疗效。

设计

多中心、前瞻性对照性初步研究。

设置

两个三级转诊中心。

患者

43 名良性胆道狭窄患者,他们是 FCSEMS 放置的候选者,被分配到 AF(n = 22)或 FE 组(n = 21)。

干预

FCSEMS 放置和取出的预定时间。

结果

中位放置时间为 6 个月(四分位距 4-6)后,AF 组中无患者发生支架迁移,而 FE 组中有 33%(7 例,近端 1 例,远端 6 例)的患者发生支架迁移(P =.004)。两组 FCSEMS 的取出率均为 100%(按方案,AF 组 22 例,FE 组 17 例)。AF 组的胆道狭窄即刻改善率为 91%(按方案 22 例),FE 组为 88%(按方案 17 例)。所有支架均顺利取出。

局限性

FCSEMS 取出后的短期随访。

结论

就良性胆道狭窄的 FCSEMS 抗迁移效果而言,AF 设计可能优于 FE。在 6 个月内,两种 FCSEMS 均可在内镜下取出而无并发症。(

临床试验注册号

NCT00945516.)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验