• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A computationally efficient modular optimal discovery procedure.一种计算效率高的模块化最优发现过程。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;27(4):509-15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq701. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
2
Detecting differential expression in microarray data: comparison of optimal procedures.检测微阵列数据中的差异表达:最优方法比较
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 26;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-28.
3
Bayesian optimal discovery procedure for simultaneous significance testing.用于同时进行显著性检验的贝叶斯最优发现程序。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 6;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-5.
4
The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments.大规模显著性检验的最优发现程序及其在比较微阵列实验中的应用
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):414-32. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl019. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
5
An empirical Bayes optimal discovery procedure based on semiparametric hierarchical mixture models.基于半参数层次混合模型的经验贝叶斯最优发现程序。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:568480. doi: 10.1155/2013/568480. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
Assessing statistical significance in microarray experiments using the distance between microarrays.利用微阵列之间的距离评估微阵列实验中的统计学显著性。
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 16;4(6):e5838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005838.
7
A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.关于使用基于排列的错误发现率估计来比较微阵列数据不同分析方法的说明。
Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 1;21(23):4280-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti685. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
8
Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.基于疾病谱数据中错误发现率的七种生成Affymetrix表达分数方法的比较。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Feb 10;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-26.
9
The optimal discovery procedure for significance analysis of general gene expression studies.广义基因表达研究中显著性分析的最优发现程序。
Bioinformatics. 2021 Apr 20;37(3):367-374. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa707.
10
The optimal discovery procedure in multiple significance testing: an empirical Bayes approach.多重检验中最优的发现程序:经验贝叶斯方法。
Stat Med. 2012 Jan 30;31(2):165-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.4375. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic changes in the brain protein interaction network correlates with progression of Aβ42 pathology in Drosophila.大脑蛋白相互作用网络的动态变化与果蝇 Aβ42 病理进展相关。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):18517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74748-9.
2
The optimal discovery procedure for significance analysis of general gene expression studies.广义基因表达研究中显著性分析的最优发现程序。
Bioinformatics. 2021 Apr 20;37(3):367-374. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa707.
3
Mistimed food intake and sleep alters 24-hour time-of-day patterns of the human plasma proteome.进食时间和睡眠不规律会改变人体血浆蛋白质组 24 小时的时间模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 5;115(23):E5390-E5399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714813115. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Human immunophenotyping via low-variance, low-bias, interpretive regression modeling of small, wide data sets: Application to aging and immune response to influenza vaccination.通过对小而宽的数据集进行低方差、低偏差、解释性回归建模进行人类免疫表型分析:在衰老和流感疫苗免疫反应中的应用
J Immunol Methods. 2016 Oct;437:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 16.
5
The transcriptome of a complete episode of acute otitis media.急性中耳炎完整病程的转录组
BMC Genomics. 2015 Apr 3;16(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1475-7.
6
An empirical Bayes optimal discovery procedure based on semiparametric hierarchical mixture models.基于半参数层次混合模型的经验贝叶斯最优发现程序。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:568480. doi: 10.1155/2013/568480. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Toward an understanding of changes in diversity associated with fecal microbiome transplantation based on 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing.基于 16S rRNA 基因深度测序,探究粪便微生物群移植相关多样性变化。
mBio. 2012 Oct 23;3(5):e00338-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00338-12.
8
Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data.利用时间序列基因表达数据研究和模拟动态生物过程。
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Jul 18;13(8):552-64. doi: 10.1038/nrg3244.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bayesian Discovery Procedure.一种贝叶斯发现程序。
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2009 Nov 1;71(5):905-925. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00714.x.
2
A genome-wide gene expression signature of environmental geography in leukocytes of Moroccan Amazighs.摩洛哥阿马齐格人白细胞中环境地理学的全基因组基因表达特征。
PLoS Genet. 2008 Apr 11;4(4):e1000052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000052.
3
The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments.大规模显著性检验的最优发现程序及其在比较微阵列实验中的应用
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):414-32. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl019. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
4
A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis.加权基因共表达网络分析的通用框架。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:Article17. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1128. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
5
Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.用于评估微阵列实验中差异表达的线性模型和经验贝叶斯方法。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1027. Epub 2004 Feb 12.
6
EDGE: extraction and analysis of differential gene expression.EDGE:差异基因表达的提取与分析
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 15;22(4):507-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk005. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
7
Significance analysis of time course microarray experiments.时间进程微阵列实验的显著性分析
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 6;102(36):12837-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504609102. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
8
Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.通过收缩方差分量估计改进差异基因表达的统计检验。
Biostatistics. 2005 Jan;6(1):59-75. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh018.
9
Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.使用半参数分层混合方法检测差异基因表达。
Biostatistics. 2004 Apr;5(2):155-76. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.155.
10
Statistical significance for genomewide studies.全基因组研究的统计学显著性
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9440-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100. Epub 2003 Jul 25.

一种计算效率高的模块化最优发现过程。

A computationally efficient modular optimal discovery procedure.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;27(4):509-15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq701. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq701
PMID:21186247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3105483/
Abstract

MOTIVATION

It is well known that patterns of differential gene expression across biological conditions are often shared by many genes, particularly those within functional groups. Taking advantage of these patterns can lead to increased statistical power and biological clarity when testing for differential expression in a microarray experiment. The optimal discovery procedure (ODP), which maximizes the expected number of true positives for each fixed number of expected false positives, is a framework aimed at this goal. Storey et al. introduced an estimator of the ODP for identifying differentially expressed genes. However, their ODP estimator grows quadratically in computational time with respect to the number of genes. Reducing this computational burden is a key step in making the ODP practical for usage in a variety of high-throughput problems.

RESULTS

Here, we propose a new estimate of the ODP called the modular ODP (mODP). The existing 'full ODP' requires that the likelihood function for each gene be evaluated according to the parameter estimates for all genes. The mODP assigns genes to modules according to a Kullback-Leibler distance, and then evaluates the statistic only at the module-averaged parameter estimates. We show that the mODP is relatively insensitive to the choice of the number of modules, but dramatically reduces the computational complexity from quadratic to linear in the number of genes. We compare the full ODP algorithm and mODP on simulated data and gene expression data from a recent study of Morrocan Amazighs. The mODP and full ODP algorithm perform very similarly across a range of comparisons.

AVAILABILITY

The mODP methodology has been implemented into EDGE, a comprehensive gene expression analysis software package in R, available at http://genomine.org/edge/.

摘要

动机

众所周知,生物条件下差异基因表达的模式通常在许多基因中共享,特别是那些在功能组内的基因。利用这些模式可以在微阵列实验中检测差异表达时提高统计能力和生物学清晰度。最优发现程序(ODP)旨在实现这一目标,它最大化了每个固定数量的预期假阳性的真实阳性的预期数量。Storey 等人引入了一种识别差异表达基因的 ODP 估计器。然而,他们的 ODP 估计器的计算时间随着基因数量的增加呈二次增长。降低这种计算负担是使 ODP 在各种高通量问题中实际使用的关键步骤。

结果

在这里,我们提出了一种称为模块化 ODP(mODP)的 ODP 的新估计。现有的“完整 ODP”要求根据所有基因的参数估计来评估每个基因的似然函数。mODP 根据 Kullback-Leibler 距离将基因分配到模块中,然后仅在模块平均参数估计处评估统计量。我们表明,mODP 对模块数量的选择相对不敏感,但将计算复杂度从二次降低到线性数量的基因。我们在模拟数据和最近对摩洛哥 Amazighs 的研究中的基因表达数据上比较了完整的 ODP 算法和 mODP。mODP 和完整 ODP 算法在一系列比较中表现非常相似。

可用性

mODP 方法已被实现到 EDGE 中,这是一个在 R 中的综合基因表达分析软件包,可在 http://genomine.org/edge/ 获得。