• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术与开放性根治性胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌的对比研究

[Comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy versus open radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer].

作者信息

Li You, Zang Lu, Hu Wei-guo, Wang Ming-liang, Lu Ai-guo, Li Jian-wen, Ma Jun-jun, Feng Bo, Jiang Yu, Wu Yun-lin, Zhu Zheng-gang, Zheng Min-hua

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;13(12):899-902.

PMID:21186407
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 204 patients with early gastric cancer undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy or open radical gastrectomy between October 2004 and December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into laparoscopic group(LAP, n=78) and open group (OPEN, n=126). Operative time, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, postoperative hospital stay, complications and pathologic findings were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared to the OPEN group, operative time in the LAP group was significantly shorter[(202.9±45.6) min vs.(219.8±45.2) min, P<0.05], blood loss was less[(144.5±146.5) ml vs. (245.0±146.4) ml, P<0.05], time to passage of flatus was shorter[(3.1±1.1) d vs.(4.5±1.6) d, P<0.05], postoperative hospital stay was shorter[(10.8±1.2) d vs. (12.4±3.8) d, P<0.05]. However, the two groups were comparable with regard to postoperative complication rate(10.3% vs. 12.7%, P>0.05), proximal resection margin[(4.0±1.9) cm vs. (4.2±1.7) cm, P>0.05], distal resection margin [(3.6±1.7) cm vs. (3.5±1.8) cm, P>0.05], number of harvested lymph node(13.1±6.5 vs. 14.5±8.2, P>0.05). The median follow up was 22(2-64) months. There were no tumor recurrences or metastases in the LAP group. In the OPEN group, only 1 patient died from peritoneal metastasis. Total hospital costs between the two groups were similar(P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is a safe, feasible, effective, and less invasive surgery for early gastric cancer.

摘要

目的

评估腹腔镜根治性胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2004年10月至2009年12月期间接受腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术或开放根治性胃癌切除术的204例早期胃癌患者。患者分为腹腔镜组(LAP,n = 78)和开放组(OPEN,n = 126)。比较两组患者的手术时间、出血量、排气时间、术后住院时间、并发症及病理结果。

结果

与开放组相比,腹腔镜组手术时间明显缩短[(202.9±45.6)分钟 vs.(219.8±45.2)分钟,P < 0.05],出血量更少[(144.5±146.5)毫升 vs.(245.0±146.4)毫升,P < 0.05],排气时间更短[(3.1±1.1)天 vs.(4.5±1.6)天,P < 0.05],术后住院时间更短[(10.8±1.2)天 vs.(12.4±3.8)天,P < 0.05]。然而,两组术后并发症发生率(10.3% vs. 12.7%,P > 0.05)、近端切缘[(4.0±1.9)厘米 vs.(4.2±1.7)厘米,P > 0.05]、远端切缘[(3.6±1.7)厘米 vs.(3.5±1.8)厘米,P > 0.05]、清扫淋巴结数目(13.1±6.5 vs. 14.5±8.2,P > 0.05)比较差异无统计学意义。中位随访时间为22(2 - 64)个月。腹腔镜组无肿瘤复发或转移。开放组仅1例患者死于腹膜转移。两组总住院费用相似(P > 0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜根治性胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌安全、可行、有效且创伤较小。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy versus open radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术与开放性根治性胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌的对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;13(12):899-902.
2
Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery.全腹腔镜下根治性BII式胃切除术治疗胃癌:与开放手术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):369-74. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816fdd44.
3
A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.一项比较进展期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治术的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):331-7. doi: 10.1159/000330782. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
[A comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May 1;51(5):396-9.
5
[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for D2 gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放手术治疗进展期胃癌的D2胃切除术]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):964-6.
6
Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study.腹腔镜与开腹次全胃切除术治疗腺癌的病例对照研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1507-13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0386-8. Epub 2009 Apr 4.
7
[Comparative study on clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人辅助与腹腔镜胃癌切除术临床疗效的对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;15(8):804-6.
8
Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: initial experience.腹腔镜辅助D2根治性远端胃癌切除术治疗进展期胃癌:初步经验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jun 20;122(12):1404-7.
9
[Short-term efficacy comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy].腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与开放远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Jul 12;91(26):1834-6.
10
[Comparison of laparoscope-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助D2根治性全胃切除术与开腹胃癌根治术的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;17(8):781-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer.中国早期胃癌防治国家临床实践指南
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Apr 20;137(8):887-908. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003101. Epub 2024 Mar 21.