• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜与开放手术治疗进展期胃癌的D2胃切除术]

[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for D2 gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer].

作者信息

Wang Dao-rong, Zhao Jian-guo, Yu Hai-feng, Wang Liu-hua, Jiang Guo-qing, Li Yong-kun, Chen Jie

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):964-6.

PMID:22990935
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 210 cases of laparoscopic gastrectomy and 180 cases of open gastrectomy for radical (D2) gastrectomy from May 2007 to Dec 2010 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 206 cases underwent laparoscopic-assisted surgery with 4 conversions. Compared to the open group, the laparoscopic group was associated with less bleeding [(208±38) ml vs. (300±52) ml, P<0.05], quicker postoperative recovery of bowel function [(2.9±0.7) d vs. (3.9±1.8) d, P<0.05], shorter postoperative length of hospital stay[(12.8±6.2) d vs. (15.6±6.8) d, P<0.05], longer operative time [(258±42) min vs. (193±30) min, P<0.05]. The number of lymph node harvested was 20.5±1.9 in the laparoscopic group and 25.8±1.5 in the open group, and the postoperative complication rate was 8.1% (17/201) vs. 8.5% (15/180), and differences were not statistically significant (both P>0.05). The recurrence rate was 2.9% (6/210) and 2.8% (5/180), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 35.6% and 37.8%, the differences were not statistically significant (both P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and effective, which can reach the same range of lymph node dissection as open gastric cancer surgery and similar survival rate.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜D2根治性胃癌切除术的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2007年5月至2010年12月期间210例行腹腔镜胃癌根治术及180例行开腹胃癌根治术(D2)患者的临床资料。

结果

共206例患者接受腹腔镜辅助手术,4例中转开腹。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组术中出血少[(208±38)ml比(300±52)ml,P<0.05],术后肠功能恢复快[(2.9±0.7)d比(3.9±1.8)d,P<0.05],术后住院时间短[(12.8±6.2)d比(15.6±6.8)d,P<0.05],手术时间长[(258±42)min比(193±30)min,P<0.05]。腹腔镜组清扫淋巴结数为20.5±1.9枚,开腹组为25.8±1.5枚,术后并发症发生率分别为8.1%(17/201)和8.5%((15/180),差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。复发率分别为2.9%(6/210)和2.8%(5/180),3年总生存率分别为35.6%和37.8%,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜胃癌根治术安全有效,淋巴结清扫范围及生存率与开腹手术相近。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic versus open surgery for D2 gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放手术治疗进展期胃癌的D2胃切除术]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):964-6.
2
Therapeutic effect of laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in 106 patients with advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助D2根治性胃切除术治疗106例进展期胃癌的疗效
J BUON. 2013 Jul-Sep;18(3):689-94.
3
[Comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy versus open radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助根治性胃癌切除术与开放性根治性胃癌切除术治疗早期胃癌的对比研究
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;13(12):899-902.
4
Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery.全腹腔镜下根治性BII式胃切除术治疗胃癌:与开放手术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):369-74. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816fdd44.
5
[Comparison of laparoscope-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer].腹腔镜辅助D2根治性全胃切除术与开腹胃癌根治术的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;17(8):781-4.
6
A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.一项比较进展期胃癌行开腹与腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治术的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(5-6):331-7. doi: 10.1159/000330782. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
[Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术与开腹胃癌切除术治疗进展期胃癌的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;15(6):615-7.
8
[A comparative study of laparoscopic-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May 1;51(5):396-9.
9
[Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 May;19(5):530-4.
10
Open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced upper gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.进展期上部胃癌的开放手术与腹腔镜辅助D2根治性胃切除术:一项回顾性队列研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Oct;60(127):1805-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and the influence on immune function and inflammatory factors.腹腔镜根治性胃切除术的效果及其对免疫功能和炎症因子的影响。
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Aug;12(2):983-986. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3404. Epub 2016 May 27.
2
Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放D2胃切除术治疗局部进展期胃癌的Meta分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16750-64. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16750.
3
Step-by-step esophagojejunal anastomosis after intra-corporeal total gastrectomy for laparoscopic gastric cancer treatment: technique of "reverse anvil".
腹腔镜胃癌治疗中体内全胃切除术后的逐步食管空肠吻合术:“反向吻合器”技术
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014 Jan-Mar;27(1):71-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202014000100017.