Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2010;9(4):209-15. doi: 10.2463/mrms.9.209.
we assessed the clinical utility of our proposed simplified method for T(1)ρ mapping calculations.
ten healthy subjects underwent scanning on a 3-tesla magnetic resonance system using an 8-channel phased-array coil. For each subject, we obtained sagittal T(1)ρ-prepared images using 5 different time of spin-lock pulses (TSL=1, 20, 40, 60, and 80 ms), produced conventional T(1)ρ maps (cT(1)ρ maps) using all TSLs, and recomputed our proposed simplified T(1)ρ maps (sT(1)ρ maps) using a decreasing number of TSLs (from 4 to 2). We then investigated the differences and correlations in T(1)ρ values of the tissues obtained using different numbers of spin-lock times.
there was a strong positive correlation (single measure intraclass correlation coefficient=0.948; 95% confidence interval=0.911 to 0.970) in T(1)ρ values of tissues between the cT(1)ρ and sT(1)ρ [1, 80] maps. The 2 maps were comparable, though there was a small difference in T(1)ρ value between the two. The total scan time to acquire the data from 5 spin-lock times was 16 min 15 s. Similarity of the T(1)ρ [1, 80] map with the conventional approach reduced scan time by 60%, to 6 min 30 s.
the clinical relevance of our proposed simplified method is potentially similar to that of the conventional method, and our method requires a shorter examination time and generally preserves the reliability of the T(1)ρ relaxation time of the tissues.
我们评估了所提出的简化 T(1)ρ 映射计算方法的临床实用性。
10 名健康受试者在 3 特斯拉磁共振系统上使用 8 通道相控阵线圈进行扫描。对于每个受试者,我们使用 5 个不同的自旋锁定脉冲时间(TSL=1、20、40、60 和 80ms)获得矢状 T(1)ρ 预备图像,使用所有 TSL 获得常规 T(1)ρ 图(cT(1)ρ 图),并使用递减数量的 TSL(从 4 到 2)重新计算我们提出的简化 T(1)ρ 图(sT(1)ρ 图)。然后,我们研究了使用不同数量的自旋锁定时间获得的组织 T(1)ρ 值之间的差异和相关性。
cT(1)ρ 和 sT(1)ρ [1, 80] 图中组织 T(1)ρ 值之间存在很强的正相关(单测组内相关系数=0.948;95%置信区间=0.911 至 0.970)。虽然两种图之间存在较小的 T(1)ρ 值差异,但它们是可比的。从 5 个自旋锁定时间获取数据的总扫描时间为 16 分 15 秒。使用传统方法获得 T(1)ρ [1, 80] 图的相似性将扫描时间减少了 60%,至 6 分 30 秒。
我们提出的简化方法的临床相关性可能与传统方法相似,并且我们的方法需要更短的检查时间,并且通常可以保持组织 T(1)ρ 弛豫时间的可靠性。