Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12222, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 28;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-86.
It has been hypothesized that birth weight is not on the causal pathway to infant mortality, at least among "normal" births (i.e. those located in the central part of the birth weight distribution), and that US racial disparities (African American versus European American) may be underestimated. Here these hypotheses are tested by examining the role of birth weight on racial disparities in infant mortality.
A two-component Covariate Density Defined mixture of logistic regressions model is used to decompose racial disparities, 1) into disparities due to "normal" versus "compromised" components of the birth cohort, and 2) further decompose these components into indirect effects, which are associated with birth weight, versus direct effects, which are independent of birth weight.
The results indicate that a direct effect is responsible for the racial disparity in mortality among "normal" births. No indirect effect of birth weight is observed despite significant disparities in birth weight. Among "compromised" births, an indirect effect is responsible for the disparity, which is consistent with disparities in birth weight. However, there is also a direct effect among "compromised" births that reduces the racial disparity in mortality. This direct effect is responsible for the "pediatric paradox" and maybe due to differential fetal loss. Model-based adjustment for this effect indicates that racial disparities corrected for fetal loss could be as high as 3 or 4 fold. This estimate is higher than the observed racial disparities in infant mortality (2.1 for both sexes).
The results support the hypothesis that birth weight is not on the causal pathway to infant mortality among "normal" births, although birth weight could play a role among "compromised" births. The overall size of the US racial disparities in infant mortality maybe considerably underestimated in the observed data possibly due to racial disparities in fetal loss.
有人假设,出生体重与婴儿死亡率之间并无因果关系,至少在“正常”分娩(即位于出生体重分布中心的分娩)中是这样,而且美国的种族差异(非裔美国人与欧裔美国人)可能被低估了。在此,通过考察出生体重对婴儿死亡率中种族差异的作用,检验了这些假设。
使用两部分协变量密度定义的逻辑回归混合模型来分解种族差异,1)分解为出生队列的“正常”与“受损”部分之间的差异,2)进一步将这些部分分解为与出生体重相关的间接效应和独立于出生体重的直接效应。
结果表明,直接效应是导致“正常”出生的死亡率存在种族差异的原因。尽管出生体重存在显著差异,但未观察到出生体重的间接效应。在“受损”出生中,间接效应是造成差异的原因,这与出生体重的差异一致。但是,在“受损”出生中也存在直接效应,这降低了死亡率的种族差异。这种直接效应是“儿科悖论”的原因,可能是由于胎儿丢失的差异。基于模型的这种效应的调整表明,校正胎儿丢失后的种族差异可能高达 3 或 4 倍。这个估计值高于观察到的婴儿死亡率的种族差异(男女均为 2.1)。
结果支持这样的假设,即出生体重与“正常”出生的婴儿死亡率之间并无因果关系,尽管出生体重在“受损”出生中可能发挥作用。在观察到的数据中,美国婴儿死亡率的种族差异总体规模可能被大大低估,这可能是由于胎儿丢失的种族差异造成的。