Department of Pediatrics (Neonatology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pediatr Res. 2024 Feb;95(3):792-801. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02766-0. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Racial disparities in preterm neonatal mortality are long-standing. We aimed to assess how cohort selection influences mortality rates and racial disparity estimates.
With 2014-2018 California data, we compared neonatal mortality rates among Black and non-Hispanic White very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g) or very preterm infants (22-29 weeks gestational age). Relative risks were estimated by different cohort selection criteria. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition quantified factors contributing to mortality differential.
Depending upon standard selection criteria, mortality ranged from 6.2% (VLBW infants excluding first 12-h deaths) to 16.0% (22-29 weeks' gestation including all deaths). Black observed neonatal mortality was higher than White infants only for delivery room deaths in VLBW infants (5.6 vs 4.2%). With risk adjustment accounting for higher rate of low gestational age, low Apgar score and other factors, White infant mortality increased from 15.9 to 16.6%, while Black infant mortality decreased from 16.7 to 13.7% in the 22-29 weeks cohort. Across varying cohort selection, risk adjusted survival advantage among Black infants ranged from 0.70 (CL 0.61-0.80) to 0.84 (CL 0.76-0.93).
Standard cohort selection can give markedly different mortality estimates. It is necessary to reduce prematurity rates and perinatal morbidity to improve outcomes for Black infants.
In this population-based observational cohort study that encompassed very low birth weight infant hospitalizations in California, varying standard methods of cohort selection resulted in neonatal mortality ranges from 6.2 to 16.0%. Across all cohorts, the only significant observed Black-White disparity was for delivery room deaths in Very Low Birth Weight births (5.6 vs 4.2%). Across all cohorts, we found a 16-30% survival advantage for Black infants. Cohort selection can result in an almost three-fold difference in estimated mortality but did not have a meaningful impact on observed or adjusted differences in neonatal mortality outcomes by race and ethnicity.
早产儿新生儿死亡率的种族差异由来已久。我们旨在评估队列选择如何影响死亡率和种族差异估计。
我们使用 2014-2018 年加利福尼亚州的数据,比较了黑人和非西班牙裔白人极低出生体重(VLBW,<1500g)或极早产儿(22-29 周胎龄)的新生儿死亡率。通过不同的队列选择标准估计相对风险。Blinder-Oaxaca 分解量化了导致死亡率差异的因素。
根据标准选择标准,死亡率范围从 VLBW 婴儿(不包括前 12 小时死亡)的 6.2%到 22-29 周胎龄的 16.0%。仅在 VLBW 婴儿的产房死亡中,黑人观察到的新生儿死亡率高于白人婴儿(5.6%比 4.2%)。通过风险调整考虑到较高的胎龄、较低的 Apgar 评分和其他因素,22-29 周组中白人婴儿的死亡率从 15.9%增加到 16.6%,而黑人婴儿的死亡率从 16.7%下降到 13.7%。在不同的队列选择中,黑人婴儿的风险调整后生存优势范围从 0.70(95%置信区间 0.61-0.80)到 0.84(95%置信区间 0.76-0.93)。
标准队列选择可能会产生明显不同的死亡率估计。必须降低早产率和围产期发病率,以改善黑人婴儿的结局。
在这项基于人群的观察性队列研究中,涵盖了加利福尼亚州极低出生体重婴儿的住院治疗,不同的标准队列选择方法导致新生儿死亡率范围从 6.2%到 16.0%。在所有队列中,唯一显著的观察到的黑人和白人差异是在极低出生体重出生时的产房死亡(5.6%比 4.2%)。在所有队列中,我们发现黑人婴儿的生存率优势为 16-30%。队列选择可能导致估计死亡率相差近三倍,但对种族和族裔的新生儿死亡率结果的观察或调整差异没有有意义的影响。