Suppr超能文献

贝那普利联合氨氯地平或氢氯噻嗪对 24 小时动态收缩压控制的疗效和持续时间。

Efficacy and duration of benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide on 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure control.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2011 Feb;57(2):174-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.159939. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

Abstract

The combination of benazepril plus amlodipine was shown to be more effective than benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events in the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial. There was a small difference in clinic systolic blood pressure between the treatment arms favoring benazepril plus amlodipine. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides a more rigorous estimate of blood pressure effects. A subset of 573 subjects underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during year 2. Readings were obtained every 20 minutes during a 24-hour period. Between-treatment differences (benazepril plus amlodipine versus benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide) in mean values were analyzed using ANOVA. Treatment comparisons with respect to categorical variables were made using Pearson's χ². At year 2, the treatment groups did not differ significantly in 24-hour mean daytime or nighttime blood pressures (values of 123.9, 125.9, and 118.1 mm Hg for benazepril plus amlodipine group versus 122.3, 124.1, and 116.9 for the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group), with mean between-group differences of 1.6, 1.8, and 1.2 mm Hg, respectively. Blood pressure control rates (24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) were greater than 80% in both groups. Nighttime systolic blood pressure provided additional risk prediction after adjusting for the effects of drugs. The 24-hour blood pressure control was similar in both treatment arms, supporting the interpretation that the difference in cardiovascular outcomes favoring a renin angiotensin system blocker combined with amlodipine rather than hydrochlorothiazide shown in the ACCOMPLISH trial was not caused by differences in blood pressure, but instead intrinsic properties (metabolic or hemodynamic) of the combination therapies.

摘要

贝那普利联合氨氯地平的组合在降低心血管事件方面比贝那普利联合氢氯噻嗪更有效,这在治疗收缩期高血压的患者中避免心血管事件的联合治疗(ACCOMPLISH)试验中得到了证实。治疗组之间的诊室收缩压略有差异,有利于贝那普利联合氨氯地平。动态血压监测提供了更严格的血压效应估计。其中 573 名受试者进行了动态血压监测,时间为 2 年。在 24 小时期间,每 20 分钟读取一次读数。使用方差分析分析治疗组之间平均值的治疗差异(贝那普利联合氨氯地平与贝那普利联合氢氯噻嗪)。使用 Pearson χ²进行治疗组与治疗组之间的分类变量比较。在第 2 年,两组在 24 小时平均白天或夜间血压方面没有显著差异(贝那普利联合氨氯地平组的数值分别为 123.9、125.9 和 118.1mmHg,贝那普利联合氢氯噻嗪组为 122.3、124.1 和 116.9mmHg),平均组间差异分别为 1.6、1.8 和 1.2mmHg。两组的血压控制率(动态血压监测时 24 小时平均收缩压<130mmHg)均大于 80%。调整药物作用后,夜间收缩压提供了额外的风险预测。两种治疗组的 24 小时血压控制相似,支持这样的解释,即在 ACCOMPLISH 试验中,与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合氨氯地平相比,联合氢氯噻嗪更有利于心血管结局的差异不是由血压差异引起的,而是联合治疗的内在特性(代谢或血液动力学)引起的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验