Arvin-Berod A, Bricault I, Terrier N, Skowron O, Cadi P, Boillot B, Thuillier C, Cluze C, Descotes J-L, Rambeaud J-J, Long J-A
Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, CHU de Grenoble, BP 217, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Prog Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.05.013.
computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are both used in the preoperative assessment of vascular anatomy before donor nephrectomy. Our objective was to determine retrospectively and to compare the sensitivity of CTA and MRA imaging in preoperative renal vascularisation in living kidney donors.
between 1999 and 2007, 42 kidney donors were assessed in our center: 27 by MRA, 10 by CTA, and five by both techniques. Images were interpreted using multiplanar reconstructions. Results were compared retrospectively with peroperative findings; discordant cases were re-examined by an experienced radiologist. Numbers of vessels detected with imaging methods was compared with numbers actually found at the operating time.
MRA showed 35/43 arteries (Se 81.4 %) and 33/34 veins (Se 97.1 %), and CTA showed 18/18 arteries (Se 100 %) and 15/16 veins (Se 93.8 %). The presence of multiple arteries was detected in only one third of cases (3/9) on MRI scans; this difference was statistically significant. The missed arteries were not detected on second examination of the MRI scans with the knowledge of peroperative findings.
MRA is less sensitive than CTA for preoperative vascularisation imaging in living renal donors, especially in the detection of multiple renal arteries.
计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)均用于供肾切除术术前血管解剖结构的评估。我们的目的是回顾性确定并比较CTA和MRA成像在活体肾供者术前肾血管成像中的敏感性。
1999年至2007年间,我们中心对42名肾供者进行了评估:27名接受MRA检查,10名接受CTA检查,5名接受了两种检查。使用多平面重建对图像进行解读。结果与术中发现进行回顾性比较;不一致的病例由经验丰富的放射科医生重新检查。将成像方法检测到的血管数量与手术时实际发现的血管数量进行比较。
MRA显示4/43条动脉(敏感性81.4%)和33/34条静脉(敏感性97.1%),CTA显示18/18条动脉(敏感性100%)和15/16条静脉(敏感性93.8%)。在MRI扫描中,仅三分之一的病例(3/9)检测到多支动脉;这种差异具有统计学意义。在知晓术中发现的情况下,对MRI扫描进行二次检查时未检测到遗漏的动脉。
对于活体肾供者的术前血管成像,MRA的敏感性低于CTA,尤其是在检测多支肾动脉方面。