Hodgson Dominic J, Jan Wajanat, Rankin Sheila, Koffman Geoff, Khan Mohammad S
Department of Radiology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
BJU Int. 2006 Mar;97(3):584-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05966.x.
To determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) renal angiography in predicting vascular anatomy before donor nephrectomy, to determine the significance of missed vessels and to ascertain whether vessels are missed because of technical limitations or errors in interpretation.
In all, 111 consecutive living donations were assessed; the anatomy on MRI before donation was compared with that at nephrectomy. The significance of additional arteries and veins was recorded at the time of donation, with extra vessels either anastomosed or sacrificed. Finally, the scans in which extra vessels had not been identified were re-examined to establish whether these could be identified retrospectively.
In all, 93 kidneys had a single renal artery and 18 had two. All lower pole arteries were anastomosed and all upper pole arteries were sacrificed. Nine arteries were identified before surgery (five were to the lower pole), and nine were missed (four to the lower pole). There were 13 kidneys with more than one vein. Four of these were seen on MRI. However, an extra vein was anastomosed in only one case. On review of the imaging, three arteries were missed because of human error and six due to technical limitations. Of the nine missed veins, only three were easily identified retrospectively. Overall, using MRI as a preoperative investigation for the 111 consecutive cases, the surgeon encountered a previously unidentified accessory artery in nine (8%), and this required anastomosis in four (4%).
MR angiography has the advantage over computed tomography (CT) of having virtually no side-effects, and if the small possibility is accepted of missing extra vessels because of technical limitation or interpretation, it is a good investigation. However, in light of the failure to visualize all arteries transplanted, we have started to use multi-slice (16-channel) CT to see if its improved spatial resolution alters the results.
确定磁共振成像(MRI)肾血管造影在供体肾切除术前行血管解剖预测中的准确性,确定漏诊血管的意义,并确定血管漏诊是由于技术限制还是解读错误。
共评估了111例连续的活体供肾;将捐献前MRI上的解剖结构与肾切除时的解剖结构进行比较。在捐献时记录额外动脉和静脉的意义,额外血管要么进行吻合要么舍弃。最后,对未识别出额外血管的扫描进行复查,以确定这些血管是否能被回顾性识别。
总共93个肾脏有单一肾动脉,18个有两条肾动脉。所有下极动脉均进行了吻合,所有上极动脉均被舍弃。术前识别出9条动脉(5条至下极),9条漏诊(4条至下极)。有13个肾脏有不止一条静脉。其中4个在MRI上可见。然而,仅1例吻合了额外的静脉。在影像学复查中,3条动脉因人为失误漏诊,6条因技术限制漏诊。在9条漏诊静脉中,只有3条能被轻易回顾性识别。总体而言,对于这111例连续病例,将MRI用作术前检查时,外科医生遇到9例(8%)先前未识别的副动脉,其中4例(4%)需要进行吻合。
磁共振血管造影与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比具有几乎无副作用的优势,并且如果接受因技术限制或解读而漏诊额外血管的小可能性,它是一种很好的检查方法。然而,鉴于未能显示所有移植动脉,我们已开始使用多层(16通道)CT,以查看其提高的空间分辨率是否会改变结果。