Stadtmann H, Grimbergen T W M, Figel M, Romero A M, McWhan A F
Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, Radiation Safety and Applications, Dosimetry, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Mar;144(1-4):275-81. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq504. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
This paper presents the results of an intercomparison for extremity dosemeters organised by the European radiation dosimetry group in 2009. In total, 59 systems were tested during this exercise including ring, stall and wrist dosemeters. A total of 1652 dosemeters were irradiated in the selected fields of photons and beta radiation qualities on appropriate phantoms (ISO finger and pillar phantom) in the dose quantity H(p)(0.07). All irradiations were carried out in selected accredited reference dosemetry laboratories (Seibersdorf Laboratories, Austria and IRSN, France). The results show that, especially at low-energy beta radiations ((85)Kr) and for beta irradiations with large angles of incidence (60°), many tested systems show pronounced under responses. On the other hand, for photon irradiations down to energies of 16 keV most systems showed good results. A participants meeting was held at IM2010 with discussion on both general aspects of this intercomparison and specific problems.
本文介绍了欧洲辐射剂量测定小组于2009年组织的一次四肢剂量计比对的结果。在此次活动中,总共测试了59个系统,包括指环、腕式和手表式剂量计。在选定的光子和β辐射质量的照射野中,在适当的体模(ISO手指和柱状体模)上,以剂量量H(p)(0.07)对总共1652个剂量计进行了照射。所有照射均在选定的认可参考剂量测定实验室(奥地利塞伯斯多夫实验室和法国国家辐射防护与核安全研究所)进行。结果表明,特别是在低能β辐射((85)Kr)以及大入射角(60°)的β照射情况下,许多测试系统显示出明显偏低的响应。另一方面,对于低至16 keV能量的光子照射,大多数系统都取得了良好的结果。在IM2010会议上举行了一次参会人员会议,讨论了此次比对的一般情况和具体问题。