Suppr超能文献

牛血清与口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)在免疫扩散试验中的特异性和非特异性反应的鉴别

Differentiation between specific and nonspecific reactions of bovine sera and foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) in immunodiffusion tests.

作者信息

Meloen R H

出版信息

Arch Virol. 1978;58(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01315533.

Abstract

The precipitating and neutralizing activities of normal bovine sera with FMDV were studied and compared. Twenty-two out of 79 normal bovine sera gave a positive reaction in micro neutralization tests with FMDV type O, while six did so with type A. In RID tests 32 sera were positive with type O and 28 with type A virus. Almost all of the 79 sera gave a positive reaction in the RID with trypsin treated virus of both types. After three to four fold concentration most sera also gave visible reactions in ID tests when tested against complete virus. When O virus was used the ID patterns produced by most normal sera clearly differed from those obtained with early and late convalescent sera from FMDV infected steers. When type A materials were employed this was also the case but to a lesser extent. The patterns obtained with concentrated normal sera showed, in general a strong line with trypsin treated virus and no line or a weaker one with complete virus. The substances in normal bovine sera precipitating trypsin treated O virus were different from those reacting with trypsinized virus of type A.

摘要

对正常牛血清与口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)的沉淀和中和活性进行了研究和比较。79份正常牛血清中,有22份在与O型FMDV的微量中和试验中呈阳性反应,而6份在与A型FMDV的试验中呈阳性反应。在火箭免疫电泳(RID)试验中,32份血清对O型病毒呈阳性反应,28份对A型病毒呈阳性反应。79份血清中几乎所有血清在RID试验中对两种经胰蛋白酶处理的病毒均呈阳性反应。经过三到四倍浓缩后,大多数血清在与完整病毒进行免疫扩散(ID)试验时也出现可见反应。当使用O型病毒时,大多数正常血清产生的ID模式与感染FMDV的公牛早期和晚期恢复期血清所获得的模式明显不同。当使用A型材料时,情况也是如此,但程度较轻。浓缩正常血清所获得的模式通常显示,与经胰蛋白酶处理的病毒有一条强沉淀线,与完整病毒无沉淀线或沉淀线较弱。正常牛血清中沉淀经胰蛋白酶处理的O型病毒的物质与与A型胰蛋白酶化病毒反应的物质不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验