Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S54-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00889.x.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) invokes evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles through the practice-based learning core competency. The authors hypothesized that among a representative sample of emergency medicine (EM) residency programs, a wide variability in EBM resident training priorities, faculty expertise expectations, and curricula exists.
The primary objective was to obtain descriptive data regarding EBM practices and expectations from EM physician educators. Our secondary objective was to assess differences in EBM educational priorities among journal club directors compared with non-journal club directors.
A 19-question survey was developed by a group of recognized EBM curriculum innovators and then disseminated to Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) conference participants, assessing their opinions regarding essential EBM skill sets and EBM curricular expectations for residents and faculty at their home institutions. The survey instrument also identified the degree of interest respondents had in receiving a free monthly EBM journal club curriculum.
A total of 157 individuals registered for the conference, and 98 completed the survey. Seventy-seven (77% of respondents) were either residency program directors or assistant/associate program directors. The majority of participants were from university-based programs and in practice at least 5 years. Respondents reported the ability to identify flawed research (45%), apply research findings to patient care (43%), and comprehend research methodology (33%) as the most important resident skill sets. The majority of respondents reported no formal journal club or EBM curricula (75%) and do not utilize structured critical appraisal instruments (71%) when reviewing the literature. While journal club directors believed that resident learners' most important EBM skill is to identify secondary peer-reviewed resources, non-journal club directors identified residents' ability to distinguish significantly flawed research as the key skill to develop. Interest in receiving a free monthly EBM journal club curriculum was widely accepted (89%).
Attaining EBM proficiency is an expected outcome of graduate medical education (GME) training, although the specific domains of anticipated expertise differ between faculty and residents. Few respondents currently use a formalized curriculum to guide the development of EBM skill sets. There appears to be a high level of interest in obtaining EBM journal club educational content in a structured format. Measuring the effects of providing journal club curriculum content in conjunction with other EBM interventions may warrant further investigation.
美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)通过实践学习核心能力将循证医学(EBM)原则付诸实践。作者假设,在具有代表性的急诊医学(EM)住院医师培训计划样本中,EBM 住院医师培训重点、教师专业知识期望和课程之间存在很大差异。
主要目的是从急诊医学医师教育者那里获得有关 EBM 实践和期望的描述性数据。我们的次要目标是评估期刊俱乐部主任与非期刊俱乐部主任之间 EBM 教育重点的差异。
一组公认的 EBM 课程创新者制定了一份 19 个问题的调查问卷,然后分发给急诊医学住院医师培训主任委员会(CORD)会议参与者,评估他们对基本 EBM 技能和居民和教师在其所在机构的 EBM 课程期望的意见。调查工具还确定了受访者对接收免费每月 EBM 期刊俱乐部课程的兴趣程度。
共有 157 人注册参加会议,98 人完成了调查。77 人(77%的受访者)是住院医师项目主任或助理/副主任项目主任。大多数参与者来自大学为基础的项目,至少有 5 年的实践经验。受访者报告说,能够识别有缺陷的研究(45%)、将研究结果应用于患者护理(43%)和理解研究方法(33%)是最重要的居民技能。大多数受访者报告说没有正式的期刊俱乐部或 EBM 课程(75%),并且在审查文献时不使用结构化的批判性评估工具(71%)。虽然期刊俱乐部主任认为居民学习者最重要的 EBM 技能是识别二级同行评议资源,但非期刊俱乐部主任认为居民区分明显有缺陷的研究的能力是需要发展的关键技能。对接收免费每月 EBM 期刊俱乐部课程的兴趣得到广泛认可(89%)。
尽管教师和住院医师对预期专业知识的具体领域有所不同,但获得循证医学(EBM)专业知识是研究生医学教育(GME)培训的预期结果。很少有受访者目前使用正式课程来指导 EBM 技能的发展。似乎有很高的兴趣以结构化的格式获得循证医学期刊俱乐部教育内容。进一步调查提供期刊俱乐部课程内容与其他 EBM 干预措施相结合的效果可能是值得的。