Department of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;17 Suppl 2:S62-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00892.x.
This study examines the effect of variations in emergency department (ED) volume on physician work efficiency (new patients per hour) and work profile (patient-related activities, including both direct and indirect patient care) and whether these differ between first- (Postgraduate Year [PGY]1) and third- (PGY3) year residents. The authors also determine if changes in volume are associated with changes in teaching interactions between attending and resident physicians.
This was a prospective observational study of resident and attending physicians in the ED. Research assistants (RAs) followed ED residents during clinical shifts and recorded a multitude of data including the amount of time spent in specific activities, the number of new patients seen, and the frequency of attending physician teaching interactions.
Third-year residents see more new patients per hour (1.79 vs. 1.16, p < 0.001) than do their first-year counterparts. In addition, third-year residents spend almost 50% less time with each patient (10.7 minutes vs. 19.4 minutes, p < 0.001), and first-year residents spend three times as much time per shift discussing patients with attending physicians (59.4 minutes vs. 27.3 minutes, p = 0.002). More of the PGY1/attending interactions resulted in educational exchanges (54.9% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.003). PGY1 residents also spend more time on dictations per patient (9.6 minutes vs. 5.4 minutes, p = 0.01) and more time on paperwork per patient (18.5 minutes vs. 6.5 minutes, p = 0.007). As ED volume tripled, PGY1 residents were able to increase their patient load to a greater extent than were PGY3 residents by decreasing the length of each patient encounter as volume increased. Overall, ED volume had no effect on the number of teaching interactions, although the length of exchange decreased as volume increased.
Third-year residents see and carry more patients than do their first-year counterparts. They do so primarily by decreasing the amount of time spent with patients and attendings and working more efficiently overall. However, they are not as capable of altering their work profiles in the face of increased volume as their first-year counterparts. While the length of teaching interactions is decreased as volume increases, the number of those interactions resulting in teaching remains constant regardless of volume.
本研究旨在探讨急诊部(ED)量的变化对医生工作效率(每小时新患者数)和工作概况(患者相关活动,包括直接和间接的患者护理)的影响,以及这些变化在第一年(住院医师规范化培训第 3 年)和第三年(住院医师规范化培训第 3 年)住院医师之间是否存在差异。作者还确定了工作量的变化是否与主治医生和住院医生之间的教学互动的变化有关。
这是一项对 ED 住院医师和主治医生的前瞻性观察研究。研究助理(RA)在临床轮班期间跟踪 ED 住院医师,并记录了大量数据,包括花费在特定活动上的时间、新患者就诊的数量以及主治医生教学互动的频率。
与第一年的住院医师相比,第三年的住院医师每小时看诊的新患者更多(1.79 比 1.16,p < 0.001)。此外,第三年的住院医师与每位患者的接触时间减少了近 50%(10.7 分钟比 19.4 分钟,p < 0.001),而第一年的住院医师每次轮班与主治医生讨论患者的时间增加了三倍(59.4 分钟比 27.3 分钟,p = 0.002)。更多的 PGY1/主治医生的互动导致了教育交流(54.9%比 34.6%,p = 0.003)。PGY1 住院医师也增加了每位患者的口述时间(9.6 分钟比 5.4 分钟,p = 0.01)和每位患者的文书工作时间(18.5 分钟比 6.5 分钟,p = 0.007)。随着急诊部工作量增加三倍,PGY1 住院医师通过增加每位患者的工作量,增加了患者的负荷,比 PGY3 住院医师的增加幅度更大,同时也缩短了每次患者就诊的时间。总的来说,尽管随着工作量的增加,交流的长度也随之减少,但 ED 工作量对教学互动的数量没有影响。
与第一年的住院医师相比,第三年的住院医师看诊和处理的患者更多。他们这样做主要是通过减少与患者和主治医生的接触时间,并提高整体工作效率。然而,与第一年的住院医师相比,他们在面对工作量增加时,改变工作模式的能力较差。尽管随着工作量的增加,教学互动的长度有所减少,但无论工作量如何,这些互动导致教学的数量保持不变。