Fairbanks Rollin J, Bisantz Ann M, Sunm Michelle
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;50(4):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
We characterize and describe the communication links and patterns between and within emergency department (ED) practitioner types.
This is a prospective, observational study of emergency physician and nursing staff communication patterns in an academic ED using link analysis techniques. Twenty ED staff members were observed in the pediatric and adult acute areas of the ED, including attending physicians, residents, nurses, and charge nurses. Data were recorded for each communication event, including duration, mode, partner, location, and interruptions. Because this study was intended to focus on professionally related communication between staff, social interactions and direct patient interactions were excluded. Frequency percentage and duration were calculated for each measure, and link analysis graphs were prepared to assist in interpretation of the data.
One thousand six hundred sixty-five total communication events were recorded during a total of 39 hours 12 minutes of observation. Face-to-face communication was the most common mode. Communication links and patterns were described and graphically represented using a link analysis technique. Communication gaps were found between ambulance providers and the providers who would ultimately take care of the patient during their ED stay. Attending physicians communicated often despite caring for separate patients, and the charge nurse seemed to be the hub for communication, linking ED personnel with non-ED staff. In the adult area, interruption rates ranged from 6.9 per hour (attending physician) to 0.5 per hour (bedside nurse), and in the pediatric area they ranged from 3.6 per hour (attending physician) to 0.3 (bedside nurse).
Distinct patterns are identified. These results will be helpful in designing future communication adjuncts in the ED.
我们对急诊科(ED)不同类型从业者之间及内部的沟通联系和模式进行特征描述。
这是一项在一所学术性急诊科中,运用链路分析技术对急诊医生和护理人员沟通模式进行的前瞻性观察研究。在急诊科的儿科和成人急症区域观察了20名急诊科工作人员,包括主治医师、住院医师、护士和护士长。记录了每次沟通事件的数据,包括时长、方式、沟通对象、地点和中断情况。由于本研究旨在聚焦工作人员之间与专业相关的沟通,因此排除了社交互动和直接的患者互动。计算了每项指标的频率百分比和时长,并绘制了链路分析图以辅助数据解读。
在总共39小时12分钟的观察期间,共记录了1665次沟通事件。面对面沟通是最常见的方式。运用链路分析技术描述并以图形展示了沟通联系和模式。发现救护车工作人员与最终在急诊科期间照顾患者之人之间存在沟通缺口。尽管主治医师各自负责不同患者,但他们之间沟通频繁,护士长似乎是沟通的枢纽,将急诊科人员与非急诊科工作人员联系起来。在成人区域,中断率从每小时6.9次(主治医师)到每小时0.5次(床边护士)不等,在儿科区域则从每小时3.6次(主治医师)到每小时0.3次(床边护士)不等。
识别出了不同的模式。这些结果将有助于设计未来急诊科的沟通辅助工具。