Gemmell H G, Evans N T, Besson J A, Roeda D, Davidson J, Dodd M G, Sharp P F, Smith F W, Crawford J R, Newton R H
Department of Bio-Medical Physics and Bio-Engineering, Aberdeen Bio-Medical Imaging Cyclotron Centre, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
J Nucl Med. 1990 Oct;31(10):1595-600.
The aim of this study was to compare technetium-99m-hexamethylpropyleneamineoxime (99mTc-HMPAO) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) imaging using positron emission tomography (PET). As investigation of dementia is likely to be one of the main uses of routine rCBF imaging, 18 demented patients were imaged with both techniques. The PET data were compared quantitatively with three versions of the SPECT data. These were, first, data normalized to the SPECT cerebellar uptake, second, data linearly corrected using the PET cerebellar value and, finally, data Lassen corrected for washout from the high flow areas. Both the linearly-corrected (r = 0.81) and the Lassen-corrected (r = 0.79) HMPAO SPECT data showed good correlation with the PET rCBF data. The relationship between the normalized HMPAO SPECT data and the PET data was nonlinear. It is not yet possible to obtain rCBF values in absolute units from HMPAO SPECT without knowledge of the true rCBF in one reference region for each patient.
本研究的目的是将锝-99m-六甲基丙烯胺肟(99mTc-HMPAO)单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)与使用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的局部脑血流(rCBF)成像进行比较。由于痴呆症的研究可能是常规rCBF成像的主要用途之一,因此对18名痴呆患者进行了这两种技术的成像。将PET数据与三个版本的SPECT数据进行了定量比较。这些数据分别是,首先,归一化至SPECT小脑摄取的数据;其次,使用PET小脑值进行线性校正的数据;最后,经拉森校正以消除高血流区域洗脱影响的数据。线性校正(r = 0.81)和拉森校正(r = 0.79)的HMPAO SPECT数据均与PET rCBF数据显示出良好的相关性。归一化的HMPAO SPECT数据与PET数据之间的关系是非线性的。在没有每个患者一个参考区域的真实rCBF的情况下,尚无法从HMPAO SPECT获得绝对单位的rCBF值。