比较农村、低社会经济地位的年轻成年烟草使用者之间的干预策略。
Comparing intervention strategies among rural, low SES, young adult tobacco users.
作者信息
Zanis David A, Hollm Ronald E, Derr Daniel, Ibrahim Jennifer K, Collins Bradley N, Coviello Donna, Melochick Jennifer Ryan
机构信息
School of Social Work, Temple University, Harrisburg, PA 17101, USA.
出版信息
Am J Health Behav. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):240-7. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.35.2.11.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate 3-month tobacco quit rates of young adult tobacco users randomized to 2 intervention conditions.
METHODS
Overall 192 non-treatment-seeking 18-to-24-year-old tobacco users received educational information and advice to quit smoking. Participants were then block randomized to 2 brief intervention conditions: (1) a telephone quitline (TQ) N = 90; or (2) a brief direct treatment intervention (BDTI) N = 102.
RESULTS
A 90-day follow-up evaluation found that 19.6% of BDTI and 10.2% of TQ participants reported 30-day point prevalence tobacco quit rates (chi-square = 2.37, P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS
BDTI can help non-treatment-seeking, low SES, young adult tobacco users quit smoking.
目的
评估随机分配至两种干预条件下的年轻成年烟草使用者的3个月戒烟率。
方法
共有192名年龄在18至24岁、未寻求治疗的烟草使用者接受了戒烟教育信息和建议。参与者随后被整群随机分配至两种简短干预条件：（1）电话戒烟热线（TQ），N = 90；或（2）简短直接治疗干预（BDTI），N = 102。
结果
90天随访评估发现，BDTI组19.6%的参与者和TQ组10.2%的参与者报告了30天点患病率戒烟率（卡方 = 2.37，P = 0.09）。
结论
BDTI可帮助未寻求治疗、社会经济地位低的年轻成年烟草使用者戒烟。
Zotero 插件