Suppr超能文献

累积劣势:理解农村烟草使用差异的框架。

Cumulative disadvantage as a framework for understanding rural tobacco use disparities.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry.

Milken Institute School of Public Health.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct;29(5):429-439. doi: 10.1037/pha0000476. Epub 2021 May 20.

Abstract

Traditional tobacco product (cigarettes and smokeless tobacco) and polytobacco use rates are significantly higher among rural adolescents and adults compared to their nonrural counterparts. Such disparities are due to several factors that promote tobacco use initiation and continuation, including individual-level psychopharmacological factors and structural-level factors such as fewer tobacco control efforts (e.g., fewer smoke-free policies and lower tobacco excise taxes), targeted tobacco marketing, less access to health-relevant resources, and more positive cultural norms surrounding tobacco use in rural communities. In this review, we use cumulative disadvantage theory as a framework for understanding how psychopharmacological and structural-level factors serve as drivers of tobacco use in rural areas. We start by describing how structural-level differences between rural-nonrural communities impact psychopharmacological influences and, when available, how these factors influence tobacco use. We conclude by discussing the interplay between factors, providing suggestions for ways to assess our application of cumulative disadvantage theory empirically and making recommendations for research and policy implementation in rural areas. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

与非农村地区相比,农村青少年和成年人的传统烟草制品(香烟和无烟烟草)和多烟草制品使用率明显更高。这种差异是由于多种因素导致的,这些因素促进了烟草使用的开始和持续,包括个体层面的精神药理学因素和结构层面的因素,如较少的烟草控制措施(如较少的无烟政策和较低的烟草消费税)、有针对性的烟草营销、较少获得与健康相关的资源以及农村社区中对烟草使用更积极的文化规范。在这篇综述中,我们使用累积劣势理论作为理解精神药理学和结构层面因素如何成为农村地区烟草使用的驱动因素的框架。我们首先描述了农村-非农村社区之间的结构性差异如何影响精神药理学的影响,以及在可用的情况下,这些因素如何影响烟草使用。最后,我们讨论了因素之间的相互作用,提出了如何从经验上评估我们对累积劣势理论的应用的建议,并为农村地区的研究和政策实施提出了建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Cumulative disadvantage as a framework for understanding rural tobacco use disparities.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct;29(5):429-439. doi: 10.1037/pha0000476. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
Adolescent Tobacco Use in Urban Versus Rural Areas of the United States: The Influence of Tobacco Control Policy Environments.
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Jul;61(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Rural Versus Urban Use of Traditional and Emerging Tobacco Products in the United States, 2013-2014.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1554-1559. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303967. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
Retail Tobacco Marketing in Rural Versus Nonrural Counties: Product Availability, Discounts, and Prices.
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):27S-36S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919888652.
5
The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth.
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jan;135:104664. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104664. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
6
Disparities in Rural Tobacco Use, Smoke-Free Policies, and Tobacco Taxes.
West J Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;41(8):1184-1202. doi: 10.1177/0193945919828061. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
8
Smoke-free Ordinances and Youth Tobacco Use in Kentucky.
Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):673-677. doi: 10.1177/08901171211066913. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
10
Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):377-85. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052294. Epub 2015 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying risk factors for adverse lung health outcomes among rural Appalachian women.
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e70035. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70035.
3
Considering Relative Rurality in Tobacco Regulatory Science.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1147-1150. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae303.
4
Geographical location, cigarette risk perceptions, and current smoking among older US adults.
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Sep 12;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/191827. eCollection 2024.
5
Navigating Threats of Wildfires and Individual Rights to Adopt 100% Tobacco-Free Policy in Rural California Community Colleges.
J Community Health. 2024 Dec;49(6):1017-1025. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01361-6. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
Tobacco Use and Cessation among a Nationally Representative Sample of Men in India, 2019-2021.
J Smok Cessat. 2023 Mar 22;2023:4292647. doi: 10.1155/2023/4292647. eCollection 2023.
7
Resilience is an Adverse Event: A Critical Discussion of Resilience Theory in Health Services Research and Public Health.
Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2024 Apr;44(3):339-343. doi: 10.1177/2752535X231159721. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Safety Net Provider Attitudes Toward Smoking Cessation Treatment.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 28;12:744816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.744816. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Nicotine-naïve adolescents who live with tobacco products users, 2018 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey.
J Addict Dis. 2021 Apr-Jun;39(2):265-269. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1856299. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Living with parents who smoke predicts levels of toxicant exposure in children.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 7;10(1):11173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66920-y.
4
Childhood/Adolescent Smoking and Adult Smoking and Cessation: The International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort (i3C) Consortium.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014381. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014381. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
What Is Rural? Challenges And Implications Of Definitions That Inadequately Encompass Rural People And Places.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):1985-1992. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00910.
8
Youth Access to Tobacco Products in the United States, 2016-2018.
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;5(6):491-501. doi: 10.18001/TRS.5.6.2.
10
Tobacco 21 policies in California and Hawaii and sales of cigarette packs: a difference-in-differences analysis.
Tob Control. 2020 Sep;29(5):588-592. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055031. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验