SUBHASH CHANDRA DAS, D.P.M., Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi-834006.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;44(3):253-9.
Based on carbamazepine's hypothesized ability to stabilize temporal lobe seizures and behavioral disorders and its ability to inhibit limbic system excitability in models such as kindling, we undertook this study with the aims of finding out the response of carbamazepine in kindler and non kindler groups and to see the relationship of socio-demographic and clinical variables in kindler and non-kindler bipolar mood disorder with response to carbamazepine. Simple random sampling was done and patients (over a period of one and a half year) between 18-50 years who had a diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder, current episode mania as per lCD-10 and who had history of at least three manic or depressive episode in the past were taken. The total sample was divided into two groups i. e. kindler and non-kindlers. Kindlers were defined as patients with 3 or more affective episodes in less than equal to 1 year apart. Non-kindlers were defined as patients with at least 3 episodes in the past with inter episodic period of more than 1 year. All the patients included in this study were followed up for 6 months and were given carbamazepine in adequate dosages. Fifty -five patients completed the 6 months follow up. Results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups based on sex, past history of substance intake, type of mood (irritable versus elated), number of relapses during the follow-up and improvement on carbamazepine. Our study does not support the kindling hypothesis.
基于卡马西平稳定颞叶癫痫和行为障碍的假设能力,以及在点燃等模型中抑制边缘系统兴奋性的能力,我们进行了这项研究,目的是了解卡马西平在点燃者和非点燃者群体中的反应,并观察社会人口统计学和临床变量与卡马西平反应的关系。采用简单随机抽样,选取年龄在 18-50 岁之间、符合 ICD-10 诊断标准的当前躁狂发作、过去至少有三次躁狂或抑郁发作史的双相情感障碍患者(为期一年半)。将总样本分为两组,即点燃者和非点燃者。点燃者定义为在不到 1 年的时间间隔内发生 3 次或以上情感发作的患者。非点燃者定义为过去至少有 3 次发作,发作间隔超过 1 年的患者。所有纳入本研究的患者均随访 6 个月,并给予卡马西平适当剂量。共有 55 名患者完成了 6 个月的随访。结果表明,两组之间在性别、既往物质摄入史、情绪类型(易怒与兴奋)、随访期间的复发次数和卡马西平的改善方面均无显著差异。我们的研究不支持点燃假说。