Kristiansen I S
Institutt for samfunnsmedisin, Universitetet i Tromsø.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Aug 10;110(18):2377-81.
Resource constraints are accepted by most health care professionals. Economic analyses aim at employing scarce resources where they yield the maximum benefit to patients now and in the future. The two principle tools are cost-benefit-analysis (CBA) and cost-effectiveness-analysis (CEA). In CBA benefits are measured in monetary terms, whereas in CEA they are measured in non-monetary terms. Admittedly based on simplifications, economic analyses aim at stating explicitly the uncertainty of underlying assumptions. The basic idea of priority setting based on economic theory is not to minimize the health care budgets, but to maximize the health benefits. When some programmes are not recommended, it is not because they are useless, but because an alternative use of resources yields more benefit. The article summarizes the basic principles of CBA and CEA and discusses some examples of CEA.
大多数医疗保健专业人员都认可资源限制这一情况。经济分析旨在将稀缺资源运用到能为患者现在及未来带来最大益处的地方。两个主要工具是成本效益分析(CBA)和成本效果分析(CEA)。在成本效益分析中,效益是以货币形式衡量的,而在成本效果分析中,效益是以非货币形式衡量的。诚然,基于简化处理,经济分析旨在明确阐述潜在假设的不确定性。基于经济理论进行优先级设定的基本理念并非是要最小化医疗保健预算,而是要最大化健康效益。当某些项目不被推荐时,并非因为它们毫无用处,而是因为资源的其他用途能带来更多益处。本文总结了成本效益分析和成本效果分析的基本原则,并讨论了一些成本效果分析的实例。