• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显微喉镜发声手术后声带息肉的客观嗓音分析

Objective voice analysis for vocal polyps following microlaryngeal phonosurgery.

作者信息

Toran K C, Vaidhya B K

机构信息

Department of ENT-HNS, Kathmandu Medical College, Sinamangal, Nepal.

出版信息

Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2010 Apr-Jun;8(30):185-9. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3555.

DOI:10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3555
PMID:21209532
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vocal polyps are the products of voice overuse, misuse and abuse as the most common causative factors. Treatment generally advised for them are voice therapy and Microlaryngeal Phonosurgery (MLPS). The improved or changed quality of voice is generally assessed perceptually and can cause intra rater variability. In this study we compared and analysed the acoustic characteristics before and after MLPS.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to acoustically determine the changes in voice quality of a group of patients before and after the surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The following patients group were studied prior to and in between 3 and 4 weeks of surgery. Altogether there were 23 patients with either unilateral or bilateral vocal polyps. Voice recording and analysis were performed with Dr. Speech acoustic software (Tiger electronics, USA). The parameters analyzed were in terms of perturbation (Jitter and shimmer), harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR) and fundamental frequency (F0).

RESULTS

The results showed that shimmer, HNR and F0 decreased significantly (p<0.05) following MLPS, but jitter though reduced, was not statistically significant (p = 0.694).

CONCLUSION

The acoustic output generally improved after MLPS as evidenced by decreased values of all the four acoustic parameters. The study also stress that voice quality can be improved through the phonosurgical procedures. This multidimensional voice analysis can be very helpful in our ability to provide objective clinical analysis of voices with vocal polyps, and following their surgical treatment.

摘要

背景

声带息肉是最常见的致病因素,如过度使用、误用和滥用嗓音所产生的病变。通常建议的治疗方法是嗓音治疗和显微喉镜下嗓音外科手术(MLPS)。嗓音质量的改善或变化一般通过主观评估,这可能会导致评估者内部的差异。在本研究中,我们比较并分析了MLPS手术前后的声学特征。

目的

本研究的目的是通过声学方法确定一组患者手术前后嗓音质量的变化。

材料与方法

对以下患者组在手术前以及手术3至4周期间进行研究。共有23例单侧或双侧声带息肉患者。使用Dr. Speech声学软件(美国老虎电子公司)进行语音记录和分析。分析的参数包括微扰(抖动和闪烁)、谐波噪声比(HNR)和基频(F0)。

结果

结果显示,MLPS术后闪烁、HNR和F0显著降低(p<0.05),但抖动虽有降低,但无统计学意义(p = 0.694)。

结论

MLPS术后声学输出总体改善,所有四个声学参数值降低证明了这一点。该研究还强调,通过嗓音外科手术可以改善嗓音质量。这种多维度的嗓音分析对于我们客观临床分析声带息肉患者的嗓音及其手术治疗后的情况非常有帮助。

相似文献

1
Objective voice analysis for vocal polyps following microlaryngeal phonosurgery.显微喉镜发声手术后声带息肉的客观嗓音分析
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2010 Apr-Jun;8(30):185-9. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3555.
2
Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of the voice in patients with vocal polyps after surgery and voice therapy.声带息肉患者术后及嗓音治疗后的嗓音声学和感知特征
J Voice. 2015 Mar;29(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
3
[Harmonic/noise ratio and spectrographic analysis in vocal abuse pathology].[嗓音滥用病理学中的谐波/噪声比及频谱分析]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1996 Sep-Oct;47(5):370-6.
4
Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.伊朗女教师嗓音声学参数调查
J Voice. 2016 Jul;30(4):507.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
5
Surgery or Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Treatment of Vocal Fold Polyps via Phonosurgery and Traditional Voice Therapy with "Voice Therapy Expulsion" Training.手术与康复:一项比较通过嗓音外科手术及采用“嗓音疗法排出法”训练的传统嗓音治疗来治疗声带息肉的随机临床试验。
J Voice. 2017 May;31(3):379.e13-379.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
Subjective and Objective Analyses of Voice Improvement After Phonosurgery in Professional Voice Users.职业用嗓者嗓音外科手术后嗓音改善的主观与客观分析
Med Probl Perform Art. 2016 Mar;31(1):18-24. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2016.1004.
7
A longitudinal study of voice before and after phonosurgery for removal of a polyp.一项关于声带息肉切除术后嗓音变化的纵向研究。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):857-63. doi: 10.1080/02699200802130813.
8
Acoustic Analysis of Voice in School Teachers.学校教师嗓音的声学分析
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018 Mar-Apr;56(211):658-661.
9
Acoustic voice analysis of patients with vocal fold polyp.声带息肉患者的声学语音分析。
J Voice. 2011 Jan;25(1):94-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.04.002. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
10
Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.无论是否患有嗓音障碍,随着嗓音强度增加,声学微扰指标均有所改善。
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre- and post-operative voice therapy for benign vocal fold lesions: protocol for a non-randomised, multicentre feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation.良性声带病变的术前和术后嗓音治疗:一项带有嵌入式过程评估的非随机、多中心可行性试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 23;10(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01508-1.
2
Pre- and Postoperative Voice Therapy for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: An International Electronic Delphi Consensus Study.良性声带病变的术前和术后嗓音治疗:一项国际电子德尔菲共识研究。
J Voice. 2025 May;39(3):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.12.008. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
3
Changes in a Daily Phonotrauma Index After Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Therapy: Implications for the Role of Daily Voice Use in the Etiology and Pathophysiology of Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
喉手术后及嗓音治疗后每日发声创伤指数的变化:每日嗓音使用在发声创伤性嗓音功能亢进的病因学和病理生理学中的作用探讨
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):3934-3944. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00168. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
4
Vocal Fold Polyps: Literature Review.声带息肉:文献综述
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;23(1):116-124. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675391. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.患有发声创伤性病变的成年女性与匹配的对照受试者之间,声压级、基频和发声剂量的平均动态测量值并无差异。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Nov;124(11):864-74. doi: 10.1177/0003489415589363. Epub 2015 May 29.