Section of Medical Materials and Technology, Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Tübingen, Oslanderstrasse 2-8, Tübingen, Germany.
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):552-4.
The aim of this study was to compare the initial hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials. Initial water contact angles were studied on thin unset and set films of one polyether and six polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression materials using high-resolution drop shape analysis at drop ages of 1 and 3 seconds. All unset PVS materials were very hydrophobic initially but showed different kinetics of hydrophilization. In contrast, the unset polyether was more hydrophilic initially but lacked distinct hydrophilization. All impression materials showed statistically significant contact angle differences between unset and set surfaces (P < .05). Dependent on the drop age, two PVS materials reached or exceeded the hydrophilicity of the polyether (P < .05). It can be concluded that studies on the wetting behavior of elastomeric impression materials should consider both the experimental drop age and set and unset material surfaces.
本研究旨在比较未凝固和凝固状态下弹性体印模材料的初始亲水性。使用高分辨率液滴形状分析,在 1 秒和 3 秒液滴龄时,对一种聚醚和六种聚硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料的未凝固和凝固薄片进行初始水接触角研究。所有未凝固的 PVS 材料初始时都非常疏水,但表现出不同的亲水化动力学。相比之下,未凝固的聚醚初始时更亲水,但缺乏明显的亲水化。所有印模材料在未凝固和凝固表面之间的接触角均存在显著差异(P <.05)。取决于液滴龄,两种 PVS 材料达到或超过了聚醚的亲水性(P <.05)。因此可以得出结论,弹性体印模材料润湿行为的研究应同时考虑实验液滴龄以及凝固和未凝固材料表面。