Huettig Fabian, Klink Andrea, Kohler Alexander, Mutschler Moritz, Rupp Frank
Department of Prosthodontics at the University Clinic for Dentistry, Oral Medicine, and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Section Medical Materials Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engeneering, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;14(11):2994. doi: 10.3390/ma14112994.
This study investigates 2 polyethers (PE), 2 polyvinylsiloxanethers (VXSE), and 10 polyvinylsiloxanes (PVS), seven of which had a corresponding light-body consistency and seven of which had a corresponding heavy-body consistency. Each light-body elastomer underwent a flowability test using the shark fin method 20, 50, and 80 s after mixing. The tear strength test DIN 53504 was used after setting the time (T0). Next, 24 h later (T1), hydrophilicity testing was used with static contact angles in water drops during polymerization (20, 50, and 80 s, as well as after 10 min). The heavy-body elastomers underwent shark fin testing with a corresponding light-body material at 50 and 80 s after mixing. The results of light-body testing were combined in a score to describe their performance. The highest differences were detected within flowability in shark fin heights between PE and a PVS (means of 15.89 and 6.85 mm) within the maximum tear strengths at T0 between a PVS and PE (3.72 and 0.75 MPa), as well as within hydrophilicity during setting between VXSE and a PVS (15.09° and 75.5°). The results indicate that VSXE and novel PVS materials can significantly compensate shortcomings in PE towards tear strength and hydrophilicity, but not flowability.
本研究调查了2种聚醚(PE)、2种聚乙烯基硅氧烷醚(VXSE)和10种聚硅氧烷(PVS),其中7种具有相应的轻质稠度,7种具有相应的重质稠度。每种轻质弹性体在混合后20、50和80秒使用鲨鱼鳍法进行流动性测试。在设定时间(T0)后使用DIN 53504撕裂强度测试。接下来,24小时后(T1),在聚合过程中(20、50和80秒以及10分钟后)使用水滴中的静态接触角进行亲水性测试。重质弹性体在混合后50和80秒与相应的轻质材料一起进行鲨鱼鳍测试。轻质材料测试的结果综合在一个分数中以描述其性能。在PE和一种PVS之间的鲨鱼鳍高度的流动性方面(平均值分别为15.89和6.85毫米)、在T0时PVS和PE之间的最大撕裂强度方面(3.72和0.75兆帕)以及在VXSE和一种PVS之间的固化过程中的亲水性方面(15.09°和75.5°)检测到最大差异。结果表明,VSXE和新型PVS材料可以显著弥补PE在撕裂强度和亲水性方面的不足,但不能弥补流动性方面的不足。