• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唾液处理对细菌DNA提取的影响。

Effect of saliva processing on bacterial DNA extraction.

作者信息

Polgárová Kamila, Behuliak Michal, Celec Peter

机构信息

Institute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

出版信息

New Microbiol. 2010 Oct;33(4):373-9.

PMID:21213596
Abstract

More than 700 bacterial species inhabit oral cavity of humans. Various oral diseases are related to changes in the structure of this complex community. Their pathogenesis can, thus, be better understood by study of oral microbial flora. As many bacteria are refractory to cultivation, molecular approaches based on PCR followed by downstream analysis are more suitable for community analysis than culture dependent methods. Effective DNA extraction from the sample matrix is a fundamental part of the pre-analytical phase but it can be influenced by processing of the starting material. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of saliva processing on DNA extraction using several non-commercial isolation procedures. Bacterial chromosomal DNA was extracted from three different sample matrices: fresh saliva, diluted saliva and pelleted saliva using four different extraction methods: phenol chloroform protocol, benzyl-chloride protocol, extraction with Chelex-100 and extraction with Triton X. Extraction from different saliva samples and the use of different extraction methods significantly affected the effectiveness of DNA extraction. The most suitable material for bacterial DNA extraction for molecular analysis is a fresh saliva sample. The most effective methods for isolating salivary DNA are the benzyl-chloride protocol and Chelex-100 extraction. Our results have implications for studies concentrating on salivary microbiome and its role in the pathogenesis of oral diseases.

摘要

700多种细菌栖息在人类口腔中。各种口腔疾病都与这个复杂群落结构的变化有关。因此,通过研究口腔微生物群落可以更好地理解它们的发病机制。由于许多细菌难以培养,基于PCR随后进行下游分析的分子方法比依赖培养的方法更适合群落分析。从样品基质中有效提取DNA是分析前阶段的一个基本部分,但它可能会受到起始材料处理的影响。本研究的目的是使用几种非商业分离程序分析唾液处理对DNA提取的影响。使用四种不同的提取方法:酚氯仿法、苄基氯法、Chelex-100提取法和Triton X提取法,从三种不同的样品基质中提取细菌染色体DNA:新鲜唾液、稀释唾液和沉淀唾液。从不同唾液样本中提取以及使用不同提取方法对DNA提取的有效性有显著影响。用于分子分析的细菌DNA提取的最合适材料是新鲜唾液样本。分离唾液DNA最有效的方法是苄基氯法和Chelex-100提取法。我们的结果对专注于唾液微生物组及其在口腔疾病发病机制中作用的研究具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Effect of saliva processing on bacterial DNA extraction.唾液处理对细菌DNA提取的影响。
New Microbiol. 2010 Oct;33(4):373-9.
2
Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.评估DNA提取方法对人类口腔细菌和真菌群落代表性的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169877. eCollection 2017.
3
Improvements for comparative analysis of changes in diversity of microbial communities using internal standards in PCR-DGGE.利用PCR-DGGE内标对微生物群落多样性变化进行比较分析的改进方法。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Aug 1;53(3):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.001. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
4
Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material.Chelex 100作为一种从法医材料中简单提取用于基于PCR分型的DNA的介质。
Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):506-13.
5
[PCR-based typing of human buccal cell's DNA extracted from whole saliva and saliva stains].[基于聚合酶链反应的从全唾液和唾液斑中提取的人类颊细胞DNA分型]
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1993 Apr;47(2):108-18.
6
Individual microflora beget unique oral microcosms.个体微生物群产生独特的口腔微观世界。
J Appl Microbiol. 2006 May;100(5):1123-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02847.x.
7
[Comparing and evaluating six methods of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood].[比较和评估从全血中提取人类基因组DNA的六种方法]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Apr;25(2):109-11, 114.
8
Isolation of DNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract.从人类胃肠道细菌样本中分离DNA。
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):870-3. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.142.
9
Methods for optimizing DNA extraction before quantifying oral bacterial numbers by real-time PCR.在通过实时PCR定量口腔细菌数量之前优化DNA提取的方法。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Jul;296(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01629.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
10
Comparison of different collection procedures and two methods for DNA isolation from saliva.比较不同的唾液采集程序和两种从唾液中提取 DNA 的方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Apr;50(4):643-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.814.

引用本文的文献

1
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.环介导等温扩增法检测唾液中的 SARS-CoV-2。
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Jan;14(1):307-316. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13737. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
2
Fretibacterium sp. human oral taxon 360 is a novel biomarker for periodontitis screening in the Japanese population. fretibacterium sp. 人类口腔分类群 360 是日本人群牙周炎筛查的一种新型生物标志物。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218266. eCollection 2019.
3
Oxidative stress in the oral cavity is driven by individual-specific bacterial communities.
口腔中的氧化应激是由个体特异性细菌群落驱动的。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2018 Nov 27;4:29. doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0072-3. eCollection 2018.
4
Identification of different pathotypes in north and north-west provinces of Iran.伊朗北部和西北部不同致病型的鉴定。
Iran J Microbiol. 2017 Feb;9(1):33-37.
5
Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols.使用五种不同的方案,从新鲜或储存 3、6 或 12 个月的全唾液中提取人 DNA。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Mar-Apr;25(2):147-158. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0046.
6
Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.评估DNA提取方法对人类口腔细菌和真菌群落代表性的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169877. eCollection 2017.
7
The PathoChip, a functional gene array for assessing pathogenic properties of diverse microbial communities.PathoChip,一种用于评估多种微生物群落致病特性的功能基因芯片。
ISME J. 2013 Oct;7(10):1974-84. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.88. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Amniotic fluid protein profiles of intraamniotic inflammatory response to Ureaplasma spp. and other bacteria.解脲脲原体及其他细菌引起的宫内感染时羊水中蛋白谱的变化。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060399. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Genotyping performance between saliva and blood-derived genomic DNAs on the DMET array: a comparison.唾液和血液来源基因组 DNA 在 DMET 阵列上的基因分型性能比较:一项对比研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033968. Epub 2012 Mar 20.