Suppr超能文献

评估DNA提取方法对人类口腔细菌和真菌群落代表性的影响。

Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.

作者信息

Vesty Anna, Biswas Kristi, Taylor Michael W, Gear Kim, Douglas Richard G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169877. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The application of high-throughput, next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly improved our understanding of the human oral microbiome. While deciphering this diverse microbial community using such approaches is more accurate than traditional culture-based methods, experimental bias introduced during critical steps such as DNA extraction may compromise the results obtained. Here, we systematically evaluate four commonly used microbial DNA extraction methods (MoBio PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit, QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit, Zymo Bacterial/Fungal DNA Mini PrepTM, phenol:chloroform-based DNA isolation) based on the following criteria: DNA quality and yield, and microbial community structure based on Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 region of fungi. Our results indicate that DNA quality and yield varied significantly with DNA extraction method. Representation of bacterial genera in plaque and saliva samples did not significantly differ across DNA extraction methods and DNA extraction method showed no effect on the recovery of fungal genera from plaque. By contrast, fungal diversity from saliva was affected by DNA extraction method, suggesting that not all protocols are suitable to study the salivary mycobiome.

摘要

高通量新一代测序技术的应用极大地增进了我们对人类口腔微生物群的了解。虽然使用此类方法解析这个多样的微生物群落比传统的基于培养的方法更准确,但在诸如DNA提取等关键步骤中引入的实验偏差可能会影响所得结果。在此,我们基于以下标准系统评估了四种常用的微生物DNA提取方法(MoBio PowerSoil® DNA分离试剂盒、QIAamp® DNA微量试剂盒、Zymo细菌/真菌DNA微量制备试剂盒、基于苯酚:氯仿的DNA分离法):DNA质量和产量,以及基于对细菌16S rRNA基因的V3-V4区域和真菌的内部转录间隔区(ITS)1区域进行Illumina扩增子测序的微生物群落结构。我们的结果表明,DNA质量和产量随DNA提取方法的不同而有显著差异。菌斑和唾液样本中细菌属的代表性在不同DNA提取方法之间没有显著差异,并且DNA提取方法对从菌斑中回收真菌属没有影响。相比之下,唾液中的真菌多样性受DNA提取方法的影响,这表明并非所有方案都适用于研究唾液真菌群落。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229c/5242530/00673c92bd15/pone.0169877.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验