School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON.
Can J Public Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;101(5):399-404. doi: 10.1007/BF03404861.
Recently published reports have raised the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) to a level of prominence that makes it difficult for governments and health agencies to ignore. This commentary analyzes CPHA (Canadian Public Health Association) policy statements and positions dating from 1970 to the present to identify where these stand in relation to seven SDH discourses. We locate where CPHA stands on the SDH, appraise its role in the SDH debate, and propose actions to better position CPHA to address SDH. Our analysis indicates that CPHA has not only kept pace with developments in the field of social determinants, but has arguably been well ahead of its time. However, CPHA's response to the World Health Organization's Commission on the Social Determinants of Health shows a striking similarity to earlier commitments that have had limited impacts. We propose that CPHA consider analyzing some of the economic and political structures and justifying ideologies that have prevented its work in the public policy area from promoting public understanding and achieving public policy traction over the past 30 years. We also offer several steps that CPHA could take to reduce the gap between knowledge and action on the determinants of health in Canada.
最近发表的报告将健康的社会决定因素(SDH)提升到了一个使政府和卫生机构难以忽视的重要地位。本评论分析了 CPHA(加拿大公共卫生协会)自 1970 年至今的政策声明和立场,以确定这些声明和立场在七个 SDH 论述中的位置。我们确定了 CPHA 在 SDH 中的立场,评估了它在 SDH 辩论中的作用,并提出了行动建议,以更好地使 CPHA 能够解决 SDH 问题。我们的分析表明,CPHA 不仅跟上了社会决定因素领域的发展步伐,而且可以说是走在了时代的前列。然而,CPHA 对世界卫生组织社会决定因素健康问题委员会的回应与早期的承诺惊人地相似,而这些承诺的影响有限。我们建议 CPHA 考虑分析一些经济和政治结构以及意识形态,这些结构和意识形态阻碍了其在公共政策领域的工作,使其无法在过去 30 年中促进公众对健康决定因素的理解并在公共政策方面取得进展。我们还提出了 CPHA 可以采取的几个步骤,以缩小加拿大健康决定因素知识与行动之间的差距。