评估健康的社会决定因素:一项范围综述。
Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review.
作者信息
Lucyk Kelsey, McLaren Lindsay
机构信息
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
出版信息
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177306. eCollection 2017.
BACKGROUND
In recent decades, the social determinants of health (SDOH) has gained increasing prominence as a foundational concept for population and public health in academic literature and policy documents, internationally. However, alongside its widespread dissemination, and in light of multiple conceptual models, lists, and frameworks, some dilution and confusion is apparent. This scoping review represents an attempt to take stock of SDOH literature in the context of contemporary population and public health.
METHODS
We conducted a scoping review to synthesize and map SDOH literature, informed by the methods of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). We searched 5 academic and 3 grey literature databases for "social determinants of health" and "population health" or "public health" or "health promotion," published 2004-2014. We also conducted a search on "inequity" or "inequality" or "disparity" or "social gradient" and "Canad*" to ensure that we captured articles where this language was used to discuss the SDOH. We included articles that discussed SDOH in depth, either explicitly or in implicit but nuanced ways. We hand-searched reference lists to further identify relevant articles.
FINDINGS
Our synthesis of 108 articles showed wide variation by study setting, target audience, and geographic scope, with most articles published in an academic setting, by Canadian authors, for policy-maker audiences. SDOH were communicated by authors as a list, model, or story; each with strengths and weaknesses. Thematic analysis identified one theme: health equity as an overarching and binding concept to the SDOH. Health equity was understood in different ways with implications for action on the SDOH.
CONCLUSIONS
Among the vast SDOH literature, there is a need to identify and clearly articulate the essence and implications of the SDOH concept. We recommend that authors be intentional in their efforts to present and discuss SDOH to ensure that they speak to its foundational concept of health equity.
背景
近几十年来,健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)作为一个基础概念在国际学术文献和政策文件中,在人口与公共卫生领域日益受到关注。然而,随着其广泛传播,鉴于存在多种概念模型、列表和框架,一些概念稀释和混淆现象明显。本范围综述旨在对当代人口与公共卫生背景下的SDOH文献进行梳理。
方法
我们采用Arksey和O'Malley(2005年)的方法进行范围综述,以综合和梳理SDOH文献。我们在5个学术数据库和3个灰色文献数据库中搜索了2004年至2014年发表的“健康的社会决定因素”以及“人口健康”或“公共卫生”或“健康促进”。我们还搜索了“不公平”或“不平等”或“差异”或“社会梯度”以及“加拿大*”,以确保纳入使用这些术语讨论SDOH的文章。我们纳入了深入讨论SDOH的文章,无论是明确讨论还是以隐含但细微的方式讨论。我们手动检索参考文献列表以进一步识别相关文章。
结果
我们对108篇文章的综合分析表明,研究背景、目标受众和地理范围差异很大,大多数文章由加拿大作者发表在学术背景下,面向政策制定者受众。作者将SDOH以列表、模型或故事的形式呈现;每种形式都有优缺点。主题分析确定了一个主题:健康公平是SDOH的总体和核心概念。对健康公平的理解各不相同,这对SDOH行动有影响。
结论
在大量的SDOH文献中,需要识别并清晰阐明SDOH概念的本质和影响。我们建议作者在呈现和讨论SDOH时要有意识,以确保他们阐述其健康公平的基础概念。
相似文献
PLoS One. 2017-5-11
Int J Equity Health. 2019-2-19
引用本文的文献
J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-11
Patient Educ Couns. 2025-1
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024-7-18
本文引用的文献
Int J Equity Health. 2015-9-15
Iran J Public Health. 2015-6
BMC Public Health. 2015-7-14
Can J Public Health. 2014-5-9
Epilepsy Behav. 2014-12
Am J Public Health. 2014-6