Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Jun;214(3):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
Since more than 10 years, risk assessment of bisphenol A (BPA) is debated at the international level. In 2008, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) expressed some concern for adverse effects, at current level of exposure to BPA, on developmental toxicity. In this context, the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA) decided to review the toxicity data on BPA with a special focus on this endpoint at doses below 5mg/kg bw/day (the no observed adverse effect level set by different regulatory bodies). This paper summarizes the conclusions of a collective assessment conducted by an expert Working Group from AFSSA. Studies were classified into 3 groups: (i) finding no toxicity, (ii) reporting results not considered to be of concern and (iii) indicating warning signals. The term "warning signal" means that no formal conclusion can be drawn regarding the establishment of a health based guidance value but the study raises some questions about the toxicity of BPA at low doses. It was concluded that studies are needed to ascertain the significance for human health of these warning signals and to be able to propose new methodologies for assessing the risks associated with low doses of BPA and more generally of endocrine disruptors.
自 10 多年前以来,双酚 A(BPA)的风险评估就在国际层面上受到争议。2008 年,美国国家毒理学计划(NTP)对当前 BPA 接触水平下的发育毒性的不良影响表示了一些担忧。在这种情况下,法国食品安全局(AFSSA)决定审查 BPA 的毒性数据,特别关注低于 5mg/kg bw/day 的剂量(不同监管机构设定的无观察不良效应水平)的这一终点。本文总结了由 AFSSA 的一个专家工作组进行的集体评估的结论。研究被分为 3 组:(i)未发现毒性,(ii)报告的结果不被认为是值得关注的,(iii)表明存在警告信号。“警告信号”一词意味着,由于对 BPA 低剂量的毒性尚未得出明确的结论,因此不能对建立基于健康的指导值得出正式结论,但该研究提出了一些关于 BPA 低剂量毒性的问题。结论是需要开展研究,以确定这些警告信号对人类健康的意义,并能够提出用于评估 BPA 和更普遍的内分泌干扰物的低剂量相关风险的新方法。