Webber Ann, Wood Joanne, Gole Glen, Brown Brian
School of Optometry and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Feb;88(2):295-302. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31820846c0.
To determine how Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test results relate to reading eye movement patterns recorded with the Visagraph in visually normal children, and whether DEM results and recorded eye movement patterns relate to standardized reading achievement scores.
Fifty-nine school-age children (age = 9.7 ± 0.6 years) completed the DEM test and had eye movements recorded with the Visagraph III test while reading for comprehension. Monocular visual acuity in each eye and random dot stereoacuity were measured and standardized scores on independently administered reading comprehension tests [reading progress test (RPT)] were obtained.
Children with slower DEM horizontal and vertical adjusted times tended to have slower reading rates with the Visagraph (r = -0.547 and -0.414 respectively). Although a significant correlation was also found between the DEM ratio and Visagraph reading rate (r = -0.368), the strength of the relationship was less than that between DEM horizontal adjusted time and reading rate. DEM outcome scores were not significantly associated with RPT scores. When the relative contribution of reading ability (RPT) and DEM scores was accounted for in multivariate analysis, DEM outcomes were not significantly associated with Visagraph reading rate. RPT scores were associated with Visagraph outcomes of duration of fixations (r = -0.403) and calculated reading rate (r = 0.366) but not with DEM outcomes.
DEM outcomes can identify children whose Visagraph recorded eye movement patterns show slow reading rates. However, when reading ability is accounted for, DEM outcomes are a poor predictor of reading rate. Visagraph outcomes of duration of fixation and reading rate relate to standardized reading achievement scores; however, DEM results do not.
确定发育性眼球运动(DEM)测试结果与视力正常儿童使用视动仪记录的阅读眼球运动模式之间的关系,以及DEM结果和记录的眼球运动模式是否与标准化阅读成绩分数相关。
59名学龄儿童(年龄=9.7±0.6岁)完成了DEM测试,并在进行阅读理解阅读时使用视动仪III测试记录了眼球运动。测量了每只眼睛的单眼视力和随机点立体视,并获得了独立进行的阅读理解测试[阅读进步测试(RPT)]的标准化分数。
DEM水平和垂直调整时间较慢的儿童使用视动仪时的阅读速度往往较慢(分别为r=-0.547和-0.414)。虽然在DEM比率和视动仪阅读速度之间也发现了显著相关性(r=-0.368),但这种关系的强度小于DEM水平调整时间与阅读速度之间的关系。DEM结果分数与RPT分数无显著相关性。在多变量分析中考虑阅读能力(RPT)和DEM分数的相对贡献时,DEM结果与视动仪阅读速度无显著相关性。RPT分数与视动仪的注视持续时间结果(r=-0.403)和计算出的阅读速度(r=0.366)相关,但与DEM结果无关。
DEM结果可以识别出视动仪记录的眼球运动模式显示阅读速度较慢的儿童。然而,如果考虑阅读能力,DEM结果对阅读速度的预测能力较差。视动仪的注视持续时间和阅读速度结果与标准化阅读成绩分数相关;然而,DEM结果并非如此。