GOJO Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 991, Akron, Ohio 44309, USA.
J Food Prot. 2010 Dec;73(12):2296-300. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.12.2296.
The risk of inadequate hand hygiene in food handling settings is exacerbated when water is limited or unavailable, thereby making washing with soap and water difficult. The SaniTwice method involves application of excess alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), hand "washing" for 15 s, and thorough cleaning with paper towels while hands are still wet, followed by a standard application of ABHS. This study investigated the effectiveness of the SaniTwice methodology as an alternative to hand washing for cleaning and removal of microorganisms. On hands moderately soiled with beef broth containing Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), washing with a nonantimicrobial hand washing product achieved a 2.86 (±0.64)-log reduction in microbial contamination compared with the baseline, whereas the SaniTwice method with 62 % ethanol (EtOH) gel, 62 % EtOH foam, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.64 ± 0.89, 3.64 ± 0.57, and 4.61 ± 0.33 log units, respectively. When hands were heavily soiled from handling raw hamburger containing E. coli, washing with nonantimicrobial hand washing product and antimicrobial hand washing product achieved reductions of 2.65 ± 0.33 and 2.69 ± 0.32 log units, respectively, whereas SaniTwice with 62 % EtOH foam, 70 % EtOH gel, and 70 % EtOH advanced formula gel achieved reductions of 2.87 ± 0.42, 2.99 ± 0.51, and 3.92 ± 0.65 log units, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the SaniTwice regimen with various ABHS is equivalent to or exceeds that of the standard hand washing approach as specified in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code. Implementation of the SaniTwice regimen in food handling settings with limited water availability should significantly reduce the risk of foodborne infections resulting from inadequate hand hygiene.
在水资源有限或无法获得的情况下,食品处理环境中手部卫生不足的风险会加剧,从而使使用肥皂和水洗手变得困难。SaniTwice 方法包括应用过量的酒精基手部消毒剂(ABHS)、手“洗” 15 秒、用纸巾彻底清洁湿手,然后再标准地应用 ABHS。本研究调查了 SaniTwice 方法作为替代洗手的方法在清洁和去除微生物方面的有效性。在中度污染的手上涂抹含有大肠杆菌(ATCC 11229)的牛肉汤,用非抗菌洗手产品洗手可使微生物污染减少 2.86(±0.64)-log,与基线相比,而用 62%乙醇(EtOH)凝胶、62% EtOH 泡沫和 70% EtOH 高级配方凝胶的 SaniTwice 方法可分别减少 2.64 ± 0.89、3.64 ± 0.57 和 4.61 ± 0.33 log 单位。当手上沾满了生汉堡包中大肠杆菌的污垢时,用非抗菌洗手产品和抗菌洗手产品洗手可分别减少 2.65 ± 0.33 和 2.69 ± 0.32 log 单位,而用 62% EtOH 泡沫、70% EtOH 凝胶和 70% EtOH 高级配方凝胶的 SaniTwice 方法可分别减少 2.87 ± 0.42、2.99 ± 0.51 和 3.92 ± 0.65 log 单位。这些结果清楚地表明,各种 ABHS 的 SaniTwice 方案的体内抗菌功效与美国食品和药物管理局食品法规中规定的标准洗手方法相当或超过。在水资源有限的食品处理环境中实施 SaniTwice 方案应能显著降低因手部卫生不足而导致食源性感染的风险。