GOJO Industries, Inc., Akron, OH 44311, USA.
J Food Prot. 2012 Jul;75(7):1303-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-449.
Pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli and human norovirus are the main etiologic agents of foodborne illness resulting from inadequate hand hygiene practices by food service workers. This study was conducted to evaluate the antibacterial and antiviral efficacy of various hand hygiene product regimens under different soil conditions representative of those in food service settings and assess the impact of product formulation on this efficacy. On hands contaminated with chicken broth containing E. coli, representing a moderate soil load, a regimen combining an antimicrobial hand washing product with a 70% ethanol advanced formula (EtOH AF) gel achieved a 5.22-log reduction, whereas a nonantimicrobial hand washing product alone achieved a 3.10log reduction. When hands were heavily soiled from handling ground beef containing E. coli, a wash-sanitize regimen with a 0.5% chloroxylenol antimicrobial hand washing product and the 70% EtOH AF gel achieved a 4.60-log reduction, whereas a wash-sanitize regimen with a 62% EtOH foam achieved a 4.11-log reduction. Sanitizing with the 70% EtOH AF gel alone was more effective than hand washing with a nonantimicrobial product for reducing murine norovirus (MNV), a surrogate for human norovirus, with 2.60- and 1.79-log reductions, respectively. When combined with hand washing, the 70% EtOH AF gel produced a 3.19-log reduction against MNV. A regimen using the SaniTwice protocol with the 70% EtOH AF gel produced a 4.04-log reduction against MNV. These data suggest that although the process of hand washing helped to remove pathogens from the hands, use of a wash-sanitize regimen was even more effective for reducing organisms. Use of a high-efficacy sanitizer as part of a wash-sanitize regimen further increased the efficacy of the regimen. The use of a well-formulated alcohol-based hand rub as part of a wash-sanitize regimen should be considered as a means to reduce risk of infection transmission in food service facilities.
导致食源性疾病的主要病原体包括大肠杆菌和人类诺如病毒,这主要是由于食品服务人员未进行充分的手部卫生清洁。本研究旨在评估在各种不同的污染环境下,不同类型的手部清洁产品的杀菌抗病毒功效,并评估产品配方对其功效的影响。在受大肠杆菌污染的鸡汁污染的手上,这是一种中度污染,含有抗菌成分的洗手产品与 70%乙醇高级配方(EtOH AF)凝胶的组合可以减少 5.22 对数的细菌,而非抗菌的洗手产品仅减少 3.10 对数的细菌。当手上有来自处理含有大肠杆菌的碎牛肉的重度污染时,使用含有 0.5%氯二甲苯酚抗菌洗手产品和 70% EtOH AF 凝胶的清洗-消毒方案可以减少 4.60 对数的细菌,而使用 62% EtOH 泡沫的清洗-消毒方案则减少 4.11 对数的细菌。单独使用 70% EtOH AF 凝胶的消毒效果优于使用非抗菌产品的洗手效果,分别减少了 2.60 和 1.79 对数的鼠诺如病毒(MNV),这是人类诺如病毒的替代品。当与洗手结合使用时,70% EtOH AF 凝胶可使 MNV 减少 3.19 对数。使用 70% EtOH AF 凝胶的 SaniTwice 方案可以使 MNV 减少 4.04 对数。这些数据表明,虽然洗手过程有助于从手上清除病原体,但使用清洗-消毒方案可以更有效地减少细菌数量。在清洗-消毒方案中使用高效消毒剂可以进一步提高方案的功效。将配方良好的酒精基手部清洁剂作为清洗-消毒方案的一部分,应被视为降低食品服务设施中感染传播风险的一种手段。