Clissold Rhian, Clissold Steve
Endocrinology Department, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK;
Core Evid. 2007 Nov 30;2(2):89-110.
Diabetes is a chronic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality, which represents a major public health concern. Interventions that can enhance patient care and reduce clinic visits will not only relieve some of this burden, they will also improve patient QOL and wellbeing.
This review assesses the evidence for the use of insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Once-daily insulin glargine has a prolonged, peakless activity profile, making it a candidate as a long-acting (basal) insulin. In combination with bolus insulin to cover prandial glucose surges, it facilitates a more physiologic approach to patient management. Evidence from large, randomized, controlled clinical trials in patients with type 1 diabetes has confirmed its effectiveness and tolerability relative to neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, with a tendency toward causing less hypoglycemia. In patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin therapy, once-daily insulin glargine has proven to be clinically superior to NPH insulin in terms of providing at least as effective glycemic control, but with significantly fewer episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia. A variety of economic analyses have confirmed the cost effectiveness of insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes and in particular it was shown to be significantly superior to NPH insulin.
Insulin glargine has established itself as a first-line choice in patients with type 1 diabetes, including children (>6 years) and adolescents, and is a recommended treatment option. In patients with type 2 diabetes it is clearly associated with less hypoglycemia than NPH insulin, and this may help overcome one of the major barriers to starting insulin therapy in this class of patient. Thus, insulin glargine is a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium available to physicians and it has the potential to significantly improve the quality of life of patients with diabetes.
糖尿病是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的慢性疾病,是一个重大的公共卫生问题。能够加强患者护理并减少门诊就诊次数的干预措施,不仅能减轻部分负担,还能改善患者的生活质量和健康状况。
本综述评估了甘精胰岛素用于1型和2型糖尿病的证据。
每日一次的甘精胰岛素具有延长的、无峰值的活性曲线,使其成为长效(基础)胰岛素的候选药物。与速效胰岛素联合使用以应对餐后血糖高峰,它有助于采用更符合生理的方法来管理患者。来自1型糖尿病患者的大型随机对照临床试验的证据证实,相对于中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH),其有效性和耐受性良好,且有导致低血糖的倾向较小。在需要胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每日一次的甘精胰岛素在提供至少同样有效的血糖控制方面已被证明在临床上优于NPH胰岛素,但夜间低血糖发作次数明显减少。各种经济分析证实了甘精胰岛素在1型和2型糖尿病中的成本效益,特别是它被证明明显优于NPH胰岛素。
甘精胰岛素已成为1型糖尿病患者(包括儿童(>6岁)和青少年)的一线选择,是一种推荐的治疗方案。在2型糖尿病患者中,它明显比NPH胰岛素引起的低血糖更少,这可能有助于克服这类患者开始胰岛素治疗的主要障碍之一。因此,甘精胰岛素是医生可用治疗手段中的一项有价值的补充,它有可能显著改善糖尿病患者的生活质量。