Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Abbestr. 2, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Jun;118(6):925-43. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9. Epub 2011 Jan 9.
Blepharospasm is a focal dystonia in which the extraocular muscles contract repetitively, leading to excessive blinking and forced eyelid closure. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is the primary symptomatic treatment for blepharospasm and its effects have been evaluated using numerous rating scales. The main scales in use today were initially used to determine whether BoNTA treatment was superior to placebo, and most controlled trials have confirmed this. More recently, these scales have been used to determine whether there are efficacy differences between different BoNTs in blepharospasm. However, although the scales used in these trials are able to differentiate the effects of BoNT from placebo, they may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between BoNTs. Most of the scales include only four possible points for each item, which would necessitate a 25% greater improvement in one group than the other to detect any differences. Current scales are also relatively insensitive to patients with mild disability who may experience mainly psychosocial problems related to their blepharospasm. Clinical trials comparing BoNTs that include substantial numbers of mildly affected patients may be unlikely to find differences because the scales do not adequately measure mild symptoms. Additional challenges with evaluating blepharospasm include the lack of precision and objectivity of current measures, symptom variability, the need to evaluate aspects of the disorder that are most important to patients, and the different types of blepharospasm. Although no single scale may be able to capture all relevant aspects of blepharospasm, more sensitive and patient-centered scales are needed.
眼睑痉挛是一种局灶性肌张力障碍,其眼外肌会反复收缩,导致过度眨眼和强制性闭眼。A型肉毒毒素(BoNTA)是眼睑痉挛的主要对症治疗方法,其疗效已通过多种评分量表进行评估。目前使用的主要量表最初用于确定 BoNTA 治疗是否优于安慰剂,并且大多数对照试验已经证实了这一点。最近,这些量表已用于确定不同 BoNTs 在眼睑痉挛中的疗效是否存在差异。然而,尽管这些试验中使用的量表能够区分 BoNT 与安慰剂的效果,但它们可能不够敏感,无法区分不同的 BoNTs。大多数量表每个项目只有四个可能的分数,这将需要一组比另一组有 25%的更大改善,才能检测到任何差异。目前的量表对于轻度残疾的患者也相对不敏感,这些患者可能主要会因眼睑痉挛而出现心理社会问题。比较包含大量轻度受影响患者的 BoNTs 的临床试验可能不太可能发现差异,因为这些量表不能充分测量轻度症状。评估眼睑痉挛的其他挑战包括当前测量方法缺乏精确性和客观性、症状变异性、需要评估对患者最重要的疾病方面,以及不同类型的眼睑痉挛。尽管没有一种量表能够捕捉到眼睑痉挛的所有相关方面,但需要更敏感和以患者为中心的量表。