Suppr超能文献

比较预填充笔和小瓶/注射器的速效胰岛素类似物起始治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的利用、成本、依从性和低血糖情况。

Comparison of utilization, cost, adherence, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating rapid-acting insulin analog with prefilled pen versus vial/syringe.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):75-86. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.546466. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies examining outcomes of different insulin delivery systems are limited. The objective of this study was to compare healthcare utilization, costs, adherence, and hypoglycemia rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiating rapid-acting insulin analog (RAIA) using prefilled pen versus vial/syringe.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a US claims database (1/1/2007 to 12/31/2008). Inclusion criteria were: ≥18 years old, with T2DM, ≥12 months of continuous eligibility, and new to RAIA. Difference-in-difference analyses after propensity score matching were conducted to compare changes in outcomes from 6 months prior to and 6 months after initiating RAIA with a prefilled pen versus vial/syringe (Wilcoxon rank-sum test for costs and t-test for other outcomes). Categories of utilization and costs (2009 USD) included total and diabetes-related inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room. Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Hypoglycemia was identified using ICD-9-CM codes.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the prefilled pen (n = 239) and vial/syringe (n = 590) cohorts after matching. Adherence to RAIA was greater in the prefilled pen cohort than the vial/syringe cohort (PDC: 54.6 vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001). While the increase in diabetes-related pharmacy costs from before to after initiating RAIA was greater in the prefilled pen cohort than the vial/syringe cohort (+$900 vs. +$607, p < 0.001), the prefilled pen cohort was associated with greater reductions in the total diabetes-related costs (-$235 vs. +$61, p = 0.006) and the utilization of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents (-1.3 vs. -0.7, p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in other outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

Claims databases do not provide optimal measures for adherence or T2DM severity, and only capture hypoglycemia events requiring clinical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Initiating RAIA with a prefilled pen was associated with better adherence and greater reduction in total diabetes-related costs than a vial/syringe. There was no significant difference in total healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

研究胰岛素给药系统的结果有限。本研究旨在比较使用预填充笔和小瓶/注射器起始速效胰岛素类似物(RAIA)的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的医疗保健利用、成本、依从性和低血糖发生率。

方法

使用美国索赔数据库(2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日)进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为:≥18 岁,患有 T2DM,≥12 个月连续合格,且为新使用 RAIA。使用倾向评分匹配后进行差异分析,比较起始预填充笔和小瓶/注射器 RAIA 前后 6 个月的结果变化(成本采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验,其他结果采用 t 检验)。利用类别和成本(2009 年美元)包括总费用和糖尿病相关住院、门诊和急诊。通过覆盖率(PDC)比例来衡量依从性。使用 ICD-9-CM 代码识别低血糖。

结果

匹配后,预填充笔(n=239)和小瓶/注射器(n=590)两组的基线特征相似。与小瓶/注射器组相比,预填充笔组 RAIA 的依从性更高(PDC:54.6% vs. 45.2%,p<0.001)。起始 RAIA 前后,预填充笔组的糖尿病相关药房成本增加大于小瓶/注射器组(+900 美元 vs. +607 美元,p<0.001),但预填充笔组与总糖尿病相关成本的降低相关(-235 美元 vs. +61 美元,p=0.006)和口服抗高血糖药物的利用(-1.3 次 vs. -0.7 次,p=0.016)。其他结果无显著差异。

局限性

索赔数据库不能提供最佳的依从性或 T2DM 严重程度的衡量标准,并且仅捕获需要临床干预的低血糖事件。

结论

与小瓶/注射器相比,使用预填充笔起始 RAIA 与更好的依从性和总糖尿病相关成本的降低相关,而总医疗保健成本无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验