Laboratório de Sanidade de Ovinos e Caprinos, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Mar 10;176(2-3):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.049. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
Parasitic infection is recognized worldwide as a limiting factor in the production of goats, and various control methods are used to reduce economic losses, often without considering the epidemiology of the parasites. This has led to the development of highly tolerant parasite populations and the presence of chemical residues in the beef and milk. The objective of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of goat farmers about parasitic diseases and to correlate this with the epidemiology of endoparasites and parasite control practices in goat farms in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The analysis was based on a questionnaire applied by trained veterinarians. The sample was homogeneous throughout the state, covering 18.4% (157/853) of municipalities. Eighty-four dairy goat farms in 81 municipalities and 200 properties with beef goats in 76 municipalities were evaluated. The herd size per goat farm ranged from 4 to 57 (average 24) for beef herds and from 2 to 308 (average 63) for dairy farms. The majority of the beef herd production was extensive and semi-extensive (98.5%), while the dairy herds were maintained under intensive farming (98.8%). The mixed production of goats and sheep was reported by 36.5% of beef goat farmers and by 20.2% of dairy goat farmers. Among the beef goats farms on which the technological level was determined, 2.0% were categorized as having high technological level, 34.5% as medium, and 63.5% as low. Of the 84 dairy farms, 30% operated at a high, 47% at a medium, and 23% at a low technological level. The adoption of practices to reduce parasitism, such as the quarantine of animals, treatment of newly arrived animals, regular cleaning of the floor, and technical assistance, was significantly higher on dairy farms than on beef farms. Although 85.7% of dairy farmers and 83% of beef farmers medicate their animals, the treatments were performed without technical criteria, and deworming intervals ranged from 30 to 120 days or more. The average interval between treatments was significantly longer in dairy goat herds (4.8 months) than in the beef herds (3.6 months). The most commonly used drugs were macrocyclic lactones (37.7% in dairy and 39.5% in beef herds) and benzimidazoles (48.9% in dairy and 31.5% in beef herds). Goat production in Minas Gerais is still in its infancy, and even though using a control program associated with other health practices, producers still rely heavily on chemicals to get satisfactory results.
寄生虫感染被全世界公认为是限制山羊生产的一个因素,因此人们采用了各种控制方法来减少经济损失,但这些方法往往没有考虑寄生虫的流行病学。这导致了具有高度耐受性的寄生虫群体的出现,以及牛肉和牛奶中存在化学残留。本研究的目的是确定山羊养殖户对寄生虫病的了解程度,并将其与巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州山羊养殖场内的内寄生虫流行病学和寄生虫控制实践相关联。分析基于由经过培训的兽医应用的调查问卷。该样本在全州范围内是同质的,覆盖了米纳斯吉拉斯州 157/853(18.4%)个城市。对 81 个城市的 84 个奶山羊养殖场和 76 个城市的 200 个肉用山羊养殖场进行了评估。每个山羊养殖场的羊群规模从 4 到 57(肉牛养殖场平均 24)不等,从 2 到 308(奶山羊养殖场平均 63)不等。大多数肉牛养殖场采用的是粗放和半粗放养殖(98.5%),而奶牛养殖场则采用集约化养殖(98.8%)。36.5%的肉牛养殖户和 20.2%的奶山羊养殖户报告了山羊和绵羊的混合养殖。在所确定技术水平的肉牛养殖场中,2.0%被归类为具有高技术水平,34.5%为中等水平,63.5%为低水平。在 84 个奶山羊养殖场中,30%的养殖场处于高技术水平,47%处于中技术水平,23%处于低技术水平。在减少寄生虫感染的措施的采用方面,如动物检疫、新到达动物的治疗、定期清洁地板和技术援助,在奶牛养殖场比在肉牛养殖场更为显著。尽管 85.7%的奶山羊养殖户和 83%的肉牛养殖户对其动物进行了药物治疗,但这些治疗都是在没有技术标准的情况下进行的,驱虫间隔时间从 30 天到 120 天或更长。奶牛山羊群的平均治疗间隔时间(4.8 个月)明显长于肉牛群(3.6 个月)。最常用的药物是大环内酯类(37.7%在奶牛和 39.5%在肉牛)和苯并咪唑类(48.9%在奶牛和 31.5%在肉牛)。米纳斯吉拉斯州的山羊生产仍处于起步阶段,尽管采用了与其他健康实践相关的控制方案,但生产者仍然严重依赖化学物质来获得满意的结果。