Service d'Anesthésie, Hôpital Foch, 40 rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):546-57. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
We have developed a proportional-integral-derivative controller allowing the closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil, guided by a Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor, during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. The controller was compared with manual target-controlled infusion.
In a multicenter study, 196 surgical patients were randomly assigned to dual closed-loop or manual administration of propofol and remifentanil. Comparison between groups was evaluated by calculating a global score that characterized the overall performance of the controller including the percentage of adequate anesthesia, defined as BIS between 40 and 60, the median absolute performance error, and wobble. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of burst suppression ratio, time to tracheal extubation, and drug consumption.
Eighty-three patients assigned to dual-loop control and 84 patients assigned to manual control completed the study. The global score and the percentage of time with BIS between 40 and 60 were better in the dual-loop group (26 ± 11 vs 43 ± 40, P < 0.0001; 82% ± 12% vs 71% ± 19%, P < 0.0001). Overshoot (BIS <40), undershoot (BIS >60), and burst suppression ratio were all significantly less common in the dual-loop group. Modifications to the propofol and remifentanil infusions were more frequent, and adjustments smaller in the dual-loop group. Remifentanil consumption was greater (0.22 ± 0.07 vs 0.16 ± 0.07 μg · kg(-1) · min(-1); P < 0.0001) and the speed to tracheal extubation was shorter (10 ± 4 vs 11 ± 5 minutes; P = 0.02) in the dual-loop group.
The controller allows the automated delivery of propofol and remifentanil and maintains BIS values in predetermined boundaries during general anesthesia better than manual administration.
我们开发了一种比例-积分-微分控制器,可在全身麻醉诱导和维持期间,通过脑电双频指数(BIS)监测仪引导,对丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼进行闭环联合给药。该控制器与手动靶控输注进行了比较。
在一项多中心研究中,196 例手术患者被随机分为双闭环或手动输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼。通过计算一个全局评分来评估两组之间的比较,该评分特征包括麻醉充分的百分比(定义为 BIS 在 40 到 60 之间)、中位数绝对性能误差和摆动,从而整体评估控制器的性能。次要结局包括出现爆发抑制比、气管拔管时间和药物消耗。
83 例患者被分配到双闭环组,84 例患者被分配到手动组,完成了研究。双闭环组的全局评分和 BIS 在 40 到 60 之间的时间百分比更好(26 ± 11 对 43 ± 40,P < 0.0001;82% ± 12%对 71% ± 19%,P < 0.0001)。双闭环组的过冲(BIS < 40)、欠冲(BIS > 60)和爆发抑制比均显著减少。双闭环组更频繁地调整丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼输注,调整幅度更小。瑞芬太尼的消耗更多(0.22 ± 0.07 对 0.16 ± 0.07 μg·kg-1·min-1;P < 0.0001),气管拔管时间更短(10 ± 4 对 11 ± 5 分钟;P = 0.02)。
与手动给药相比,该控制器可以在全身麻醉期间自动输送丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼,并更好地将 BIS 值维持在预定范围内。