Bsisu Isam, Alqassieh Rami, Aloweidi Abdelkarim, Abu-Humdan Abdulrahman, Subuh Aseel, Masarweh Deema
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
UCSF Center for Health Equity in Surgery and Anesthesia, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 25;14(5):447. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050447.
Success in integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesia depends on collaboration with anesthesiologists, respecting their expertise, and understanding their opinions. The aim of this study was to illustrate the confidence in AI integration in perioperative anesthetic care among Jordanian anesthesiologists and anesthesia residents working at tertiary teaching hospitals. This cross-sectional study was conducted via self-administered online questionnaire and includes 118 responses from 44 anesthesiologists and 74 anesthesia residents. We used a five-point Likert scale to investigate the confidence in AI's role in different aspects of the perioperative period. A significant difference was found between anesthesiologists and anesthesia residents in confidence in the role of AI in operating room logistics and management, with an average score of 3.6 ± 1.3 among residents compared to 2.9 ± 1.4 among specialists ( = 0.012). The role of AI in event prediction under anesthesia scored 3.5 ± 1.4 among residents compared to 2.9 ± 1.4 among specialists ( = 0.032) and the role of AI in decision-making in anesthetic complications 3.3 ± 1.4 among residents and 2.8 ± 1.4 among specialists ( = 0.034). Also, 65 (55.1%) were concerned that the integration of AI will lead to less human-human interaction, while 81 (68.6%) believed that AI-based technology will lead to more adherence to guidelines. In conclusion, AI has the potential to be a revolutionary tool in anesthesia, and hesitancy towards increased dependency on this technology is decreasing with newer generations of practitioners.
在麻醉领域成功整合人工智能(AI)取决于与麻醉医生的合作,尊重他们的专业知识,并理解他们的观点。本研究的目的是阐明约旦在三级教学医院工作的麻醉医生和麻醉住院医师对围手术期麻醉护理中人工智能整合的信心。这项横断面研究通过自行填写的在线问卷进行,共收到来自44名麻醉医生和74名麻醉住院医师的118份回复。我们使用五点李克特量表来调查对人工智能在围手术期不同方面作用的信心。结果发现,麻醉医生和麻醉住院医师在对人工智能在手术室后勤和管理方面作用的信心上存在显著差异,住院医师的平均得分为3.6±1.3,而专家的平均得分为2.9±1.4(P = 0.012)。人工智能在麻醉事件预测方面的作用,住院医师的得分是3.5±1.4,专家为2.9±1.4(P = 0.032);在麻醉并发症决策方面,住院医师的得分是3.3±1.4,专家为2.8±1.4(P = 0.034)。此外,65人(55.1%)担心人工智能的整合会导致人与人之间的互动减少,而81人(68.6%)认为基于人工智能的技术将导致更多地遵循指南。总之,人工智能有潜力成为麻醉领域的革命性工具,随着新一代从业者的出现,对增加对该技术依赖的犹豫正在减少。