Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81059-7.
Few issues in evolutionary biology have received as much attention over the years or have generated as much controversy as those involving evolutionary rates. One unresolved issue is whether or not shifts in speclation and/or extinction rates are closely tied to the origin of 'key' innovations in evolution. This discussion has long been dominated by 'time-based' methods using data from the fossil record. Recently, however, attention has shifted to 'tree-based' methods, in which time, if It plays any role at all, is incorporated secondarily, usually based on molecular data. Tests of hypotheses about key innovations do require Information about phylogenetic relationships, and some of these tests can be implemented without any information about time. However, every effort should be made to obtain information about time, which greatly increases the power of such tests.
在进化生物学中,几乎没有哪个问题像涉及进化速度的问题那样多年来受到如此多的关注,也没有哪个问题引发如此多的争议。一个悬而未决的问题是,物种形成和/或灭绝率的变化是否与进化中“关键”创新的起源密切相关。长期以来,这个讨论一直由基于时间的方法主导,这些方法使用来自化石记录的数据。然而,最近,人们的注意力已经转移到基于树的方法上,在这种方法中,时间(如果有任何作用的话)是次要的,通常基于分子数据。对关键创新假说的检验确实需要关于系统发育关系的信息,其中一些检验可以在没有任何时间信息的情况下进行。然而,应该尽一切努力获取有关时间的信息,这将大大提高此类检验的功效。