Discipline of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, SAR China.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Jun;33(3):318-24. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq079. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
Oral appliances (OAs) are increasingly advocated as a treatment option for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, it is unclear how their different design features influence treatment efficacy. The aim of this research was to systematically review the evidence on the efficacy of different OAs on polysomnographic indices of OSA. A MeSH and text word search were developed for Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane library. The initial search identified 1475 references, of which 116 related to studies comparing OAs with control appliances. Among those, 14 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which formed the basis of this review. The type of OA investigated in these trials was mandibular advancement devices (MADs), which were compared with either inactive appliances (six studies) or other types of MADs with different design features. Compared with inactive appliances, all MADs improved polysomnographic indices, suggesting that mandibular advancement is a crucial design feature of OA therapy for OSA. The evidence shows that there is no one MAD design that most effectively improves polysomnographic indices, but that efficacy depends on a number of factors including severity of OSA, materials and method of fabrication, type of MAD (monobloc/twin block), and the degree of protrusion (sagittal and vertical). These findings highlight the absence of a universal definition of treatment success. Future trials of MAD designs need to be assessed according to agreed success criteria in order to guide clinical practice as to which design of OAs may be the most effective in the treatment of OSA.
口腔矫治器(OA)作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的治疗选择越来越受到推崇。然而,其不同的设计特点如何影响治疗效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统评价不同 OA 对 OSA 多导睡眠图指标疗效的证据。采用 MeSH 和文本词搜索方法对 Medline、Embase、Cinahl 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索。最初的检索共确定了 1475 篇参考文献,其中 116 篇与比较 OA 与对照器具的研究相关。在这些研究中,有 14 项为随机对照试验(RCT),这构成了本综述的基础。这些试验中研究的 OA 类型为下颌前伸装置(MAD),将其与无活性器具(6 项研究)或具有不同设计特点的其他类型 MAD 进行比较。与无活性器具相比,所有 MAD 均改善了多导睡眠图指标,这表明下颌前伸是 OA 治疗 OSA 的关键设计特点。证据表明,没有一种 MAD 设计能最有效地改善多导睡眠图指标,但疗效取决于多个因素,包括 OSA 的严重程度、材料和制作方法、MAD 的类型(单体/双体块)以及突出程度(矢状和垂直)。这些发现强调了治疗成功缺乏统一定义。未来的 MAD 设计试验需要根据商定的成功标准进行评估,以便就哪种 OA 设计可能最有效地治疗 OSA 为临床实践提供指导。