Dimijian Gregory G
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2010 Jul;23(3):292-300. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2010.11928637.
As the 21st century dawns, I reflect on the history of humankind with growing concern about the need to understand the underlying biological and cultural roots of ethnic conflict and warfare. In the many studies of human conflict, innate biological predispositions have been neglected. This article is the third part of a series of seminars for medical residents at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School at Dallas (see http://adarwinstudygroup.org/). The series starts with in-depth coverage of Darwinian natural and sexual selection, with examples from the domestication of animals and plants and the crisis of antibiotic resistance. The series strives to show how biology has been neglected in the study of the we-they orientation of human behavior, with its devastating consequences. The subject material is profoundly disturbing, as it looks at "human nature" and contrasts the "dark side" of human behavior with the opposite, profoundly caring and loving side.
随着21世纪的来临,我对人类历史进行反思,愈发担忧需要去理解种族冲突和战争背后的生物学和文化根源。在众多关于人类冲突的研究中,先天的生物倾向一直被忽视。本文是为达拉斯德克萨斯大学西南医学中心的住院医生举办的系列研讨会的第三部分(见http://adarwinstudygroup.org/)。该系列开篇深入探讨了达尔文的自然选择和性选择,并列举了动植物驯化以及抗生素耐药性危机的例子。该系列力图展示在对人类行为的“我们与他们”倾向的研究中生物学是如何被忽视的,以及这种忽视所带来的毁灭性后果。主题材料令人深感不安,因为它审视了“人性”,并将人类行为的“黑暗面”与相反的、充满关怀和爱的一面进行了对比。