Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dyslexia. 2011 Feb;17(1):2-18. doi: 10.1002/dys.423. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
The study concerns reading development and its precursors in a transparent orthography. Dutch children differing in family risk for dyslexia were followed from kindergarten through fifth grade. In fifth grade, at-risk dyslexic (n = 22), at-risk non-dyslexic (n = 45), and control children (n = 12) were distinguished. In kindergarten, the at-risk non-dyslexics performed better than the at-risk dyslexics, but worse than the controls on letter-knowledge and rapid naming. The groups did not differ on phonological awareness. At-risk dyslexics read less fluently from first grade onwards than the other groups. At-risk non-dyslexics' reading fluency was at an intermediate position between the other groups at the start of reading. By fifth grade they had reached a similar level as the controls on word reading, but still lagged behind on pseudoword reading. Results further showed that the parents of the groups of at-risk children differed in educational level and reading skills. Overall, the groups of at-risk children differed on pre-reading skills as well as on reading development. These differences do not seem to stem from differences in intellectual abilities or literacy environment. Instead, the better reading skills of parents of at-risk non-dyslexics suggest that these children might have a lower genetic liability.
本研究关注在透明正字法中阅读发展及其前兆。从幼儿园到五年级,我们对具有阅读障碍家族风险的荷兰儿童进行了追踪。在五年级,区分出高风险阅读障碍儿童(n=22)、高风险非阅读障碍儿童(n=45)和对照组儿童(n=12)。在幼儿园,高风险非阅读障碍儿童在字母知识和快速命名方面的表现优于高风险阅读障碍儿童,但劣于对照组。三组在语音意识方面没有差异。从一年级开始,高风险阅读障碍儿童的阅读流利度一直低于其他两组。高风险非阅读障碍儿童的阅读流利度在阅读开始时处于其他两组之间的中间位置。到五年级时,他们在单词阅读方面与对照组达到相似水平,但在假词阅读方面仍落后。结果还表明,高风险儿童组的父母在教育水平和阅读技能方面存在差异。总体而言,高风险儿童组在阅读前技能和阅读发展方面存在差异。这些差异似乎并非源自智力能力或读写环境的差异。相反,高风险非阅读障碍儿童的父母具有更好的阅读技能,这表明这些儿童的遗传易感性可能较低。