Mezzalira Joana Claudia, Ohlweiler Lain Uriel, da Costa Gerger Renato Pereira, Casali Renata, Vieira Fabiano Koerich, Ambrósio Carlos Eduardo, Miglino Maria Angélica, Rodrigues José Luiz, Mezzalira Alceu, Bertolini Marcelo
Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Center of Agronomy and Veterinary Sciences (CAV), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC) , Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Cell Reprogram. 2011 Feb;13(1):65-76. doi: 10.1089/cell.2010.0050. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the cytoplast type and activation process on development of cloned embryos. Bovine oocytes (MII) or zygotes at the one-cell stage (IVF) were manually bisected and segregated in MII or IVF hemi-cytoplasts or hemi-karyoplasts. Adult skin cells from a bovine female were used as nucleus donors (SC). Experimental groups were composed of IVF embryos; parthenogenetic embryos; hand-made cloned (HMC) embryos; and reconstructed HMC embryos using IVF hemi-cytoplast + MII hemi-cytoplast + SC (G-I); IVF hemi-cytoplast + IVF hemi-cytoplast + SC (G-II); MII hemi-cytoplast + IVF hemi-karyoplast (G-III); and IVF hemi-cytoplast + IVF hemi-karyoplast (G-IV). Embryos from G-I to G-IV were allocated to subgroups as sperm-activated (SA) or were further chemically activated (SA + CA). Embryos from all groups and subgroups were in vitro cultured in the WOW system. Blastocyst development in subgroup G-I SA (28.2%) was similar to IVF (27.0%) and HMC (31.4%) controls, perhaps due to a to a more suitable activation process and/or better complementation of cytoplasmic reprogramming factors, with the other groups and subgroups having lower levels of development. No blastocyst development was observed when using IVF hemi-karyoplasts (G-III and G-IV), possibly due to the manipulation process during a sensitive biological period. In summary, the presence of cytoplasmic factors from MII hemi-oocytes and the sperm activation process from hemi-zygotes appear to be necessary for adequate in vitro development, as only the zygote-oocyte hemi-complementation was as efficient as controls for the generation of bovine cloned blastocysts.
本研究的目的是评估细胞质类型和激活过程对克隆胚胎发育的影响。将牛的卵母细胞(MII期)或单细胞阶段的受精卵(体外受精)手动二分,并分别置于MII或体外受精的半细胞质或半细胞核质中。取自一头母牛的成年皮肤细胞用作核供体(体细胞)。实验组包括体外受精胚胎;孤雌生殖胚胎;手工克隆(HMC)胚胎;以及使用体外受精半细胞质 + MII半细胞质 + 体细胞构建的HMC胚胎(G-I组);体外受精半细胞质 + 体外受精半细胞质 + 体细胞(G-II组);MII半细胞质 + 体外受精半细胞核质(G-III组);以及体外受精半细胞质 + 体外受精半细胞核质(G-IV组)。将G-I至G-IV组的胚胎分为精子激活(SA)亚组或进一步化学激活(SA + CA)亚组。所有组和亚组的胚胎均在WOW系统中进行体外培养。G-I SA亚组的囊胚发育率(28.2%)与体外受精对照组(27.0%)和HMC对照组(31.4%)相似,这可能是由于激活过程更合适和/或细胞质重编程因子的互补性更好,而其他组和亚组的发育水平较低。使用体外受精半细胞核质时(G-III组和G-IV组)未观察到囊胚发育,这可能是由于在敏感生物学时期的操作过程所致。总之,MII半卵母细胞中的细胞质因子的存在以及半受精卵的精子激活过程似乎是体外充分发育所必需的,因为只有合子 - 卵母细胞半互补在产生牛克隆囊胚方面与对照组一样有效。