Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Despite well-publicized guidelines on the appropriate management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes, implementation of risk-reducing practices remains poor. This paper describes the rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive program of CVD risk reduction delivered by nurse practitioner (NP)/community health worker (CHW) teams versus enhanced usual care in improving the proportion of patients in urban community health centers who achieve goal levels recommended by national guidelines for lipids, blood pressure, HbA1c and prescription of appropriate medications.
The COACH (Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health) trial is a randomized controlled trial in which patients at federally-qualified community health centers were randomly assigned to one of two groups: comprehensive intensive management of CVD risk factors for one year by a NP/CHW team or an enhanced usual care control group.
A total of 3899 patients were assessed for eligibility and 525 were randomized. Groups were comparable at baseline on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with the exception of statistically significant differences in total cholesterol and hemoglobin A1c.
This study is a novel amalgam of multilevel interdisciplinary strategies to translate highly efficacious therapies to low-income federally-funded health centers that care for patients who carry a disproportionate burden of CVD, type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled CVD risk factors. The impact of such a community clinic-based intervention is potentially enormous.
尽管有关于心血管疾病 (CVD) 和 2 型糖尿病适当管理的广为人知的指南,但降低风险的实践仍实施不佳。本文描述了一项随机对照临床试验的原理和设计,该试验评估了由执业护士 (NP)/社区卫生工作者 (CHW) 团队提供的综合 CVD 风险降低计划与强化常规护理相比,在提高城市社区卫生中心患者达到国家指南推荐的血脂、血压、HbA1c 和适当药物处方目标水平的比例方面的有效性。
COACH(社区外展和心血管健康)试验是一项随机对照试验,在该试验中,联邦合格社区卫生中心的患者被随机分配到两组之一:NP/CHW 团队进行为期一年的 CVD 风险因素综合强化管理或增强的常规护理对照组。
共有 3899 名患者接受了资格评估,其中 525 名被随机分组。两组在社会人口统计学和临床特征方面基线可比,除总胆固醇和血红蛋白 A1c 存在统计学显著差异外。
这项研究是将高效疗法转化为为患有 CVD、2 型糖尿病和未控制的 CVD 风险因素的患者提供服务的低收入联邦资助的卫生中心的多层次多学科策略的新颖结合。这种基于社区诊所的干预措施的影响可能是巨大的。