• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Hypertension Guidelines Address Social Determinants of Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.高血压指南如何应对健康的社会决定因素:系统范围审查。
Med Care. 2021 Dec 1;59(12):1122-1129. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001649.
2
Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review.初级保健中成人健康筛查工具的社会决定因素:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 19;14:e68668. doi: 10.2196/68668.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The Construction and Meaning of Race Within Hypertension Guidelines: A Systematic Scoping Review.高血压指南中种族的构建与意义:系统范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2531-2542. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08874-9. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Scoping review: national monitoring frameworks for social determinants of health and health equity.范围审查:健康的社会决定因素和健康公平性的国家监测框架
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 5;9:28831. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.28831. eCollection 2016.
9
Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines.国家糖尿病治疗指南中的社会关怀建议。
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Oct;22(10):481-491. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Impact of hospital and health system initiatives to address Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.美国医院和卫生系统应对健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)举措的影响:同行评议文献的范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12494-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Awareness of Hypertension Among Older Adults.老年人高血压的患病率及知晓率
Cureus. 2025 Jun 9;17(6):e85622. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85622. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Mediating Effect of Established Risk Factors on Association Between Social Determinants and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality.既定风险因素对社会决定因素与心血管疾病死亡率之间关联的中介作用。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 2):101744. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101744. Epub 2025 May 8.
3
Social Disadvantage and Disparities in Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.社会劣势与慢性肝病的差异:一项系统综述
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 30. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003171.
4
Clinician Awareness of Patient-Reported Health-Related Social Needs: There's Room for Improvement.临床医生对患者报告的与健康相关的社会需求的认识:仍有改进的空间。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241290887. doi: 10.1177/21501319241290887.
5
Recruitment of emergency department patients to a prospective observational study.将急诊科患者纳入一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 7;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00717-y.
6
A Global Perspective on Socioeconomic Determinants of Cardiovascular Health.心血管健康社会经济决定因素的全球视角
Can J Cardiol. 2025 Jan;41(1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
The Construction and Meaning of Race Within Hypertension Guidelines: A Systematic Scoping Review.高血压指南中种族的构建与意义:系统范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2531-2542. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08874-9. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
Community and Healthcare Perspectives on Implementing Hypertension Interventions for a Multiethnic Safety-Net Population.社区和医疗保健视角下的多族裔医疗保障人群高血压干预措施实施
Ethn Dis. 2024 Apr 24;DECIPHeR(Spec Issue):68-80. doi: 10.18865/ed.DECIPHeR.68. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.在线共同设计初级保健提供者的社会健康整合和社会风险知情护理继续教育。
Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):26-35. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.113. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
Blood Pressure Control and Maintenance in a Prospective Cohort of Younger Veterans: Roles of Sex, Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health.年轻退伍军人前瞻性队列中的血压控制与维持:性别、种族、族裔及健康的社会决定因素的作用
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 23:2024.04.22.24306203. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.22.24306203.

本文引用的文献

1
Racism and health: A call to action for health services research.种族主义与健康:对卫生服务研究的行动呼吁。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):569-572. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13693. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
2
Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018.美国成年人高血压患者血压控制趋势,1999-2000 年至 2017-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1190-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545.
3
Hidden in Plain Sight - Reconsidering the Use of Race Correction in Clinical Algorithms.隐匿于众目睽睽之下——重新审视临床算法中种族校正的应用
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):874-882. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2004740. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Addressing Social Determinants of Health Within Healthcare Delivery Systems: a Framework to Ground and Inform Health Outcomes.在医疗服务提供系统中解决健康的社会决定因素:一个用于奠定基础和指导健康结果的框架。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1571-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05720-6. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Bridging the Gap Between Where the Quality Metric Ends and Real Life Begins-A Trusting Relationship.
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):177-178. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5132.
6
Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers.第一部分:患者和照护者对社会风险筛查可接受性的定量研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S25-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010.
7
2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会成人高血压临床绩效与质量指标:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e000057. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000057. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control in US Adults: Trends in the Hypertension Control Cascade by Population Subgroup (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2016).美国成年人的高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率:按人口亚组分析高血压控制级联的趋势(1999-2016 年国家健康和营养调查)。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 31;188(12):2165-2174. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz177.
9
Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.人类血压测量:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087.
10
Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.耐药性高血压:检测、评估与管理:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Hypertension. 2018 Nov;72(5):e53-e90. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084.

高血压指南如何应对健康的社会决定因素:系统范围审查。

How Hypertension Guidelines Address Social Determinants of Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.

机构信息

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies & Family and Community Medicine.

Departments of Family and Community Medicine.

出版信息

Med Care. 2021 Dec 1;59(12):1122-1129. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001649.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001649
PMID:34779795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8597925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-level and community-level social and economic conditions impact hypertension risk and control. We examined adult hypertension management guidelines to explore whether and how existing guidelines refer to social care activities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore how hypertension guidelines reference social care activities.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A systematic scoping review of clinical guidelines for adult hypertension management. We employed a PubMed search strategy to identify all hypertension guidelines published in the United States between 1977 and 2019. We reviewed all titles to identify the most updated versions focused on nonpregnant adults with hypertension. We extracted instances where guidelines referred to social determinants of health (SDH) or social care activities. The primary outcome was how guidelines covered social care activities, defined using a framework adapted from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).

RESULTS

Search terms yielded 126 guidelines. Thirty-six guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 72% (26/36) recommended social care activities as part of hypertension management; 58% recommended clinicians change clinical practice based on social risk information. These recommendations often lacked specific guidance around how to directly address social risk factors or reduce the impact of these risks on hypertension management. When guidelines referred to specific social factors, patient financial security was the most common. Over time, hypertension guidelines have included more references to SDH.

CONCLUSION

Information about SDH is included in many hypertension guidelines, but few guidelines provide clear guidance for clinicians or health systems on how to identify and address social risk factors in the context of care delivery.

摘要

背景

患者层面和社区层面的社会经济状况会影响高血压的风险和控制。我们研究了成人高血压管理指南,以探讨现有指南是否以及如何提及社会护理活动。

目的

本研究旨在探讨高血压指南如何参考社会护理活动。

研究设计

对成人高血压管理临床指南进行系统的范围综述。我们采用了 PubMed 搜索策略来确定 1977 年至 2019 年期间在美国发布的所有高血压指南。我们审查了所有标题以确定针对非妊娠高血压成年人的最新版本。我们提取了指南提到健康社会决定因素(SDH)或社会护理活动的实例。主要结果是指南如何涵盖社会护理活动,使用改编自美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)的框架来定义。

结果

搜索词产生了 126 条指南。36 条指南符合纳入标准。其中,72%(26/36)建议将社会护理活动作为高血压管理的一部分;58%建议临床医生根据社会风险信息改变临床实践。这些建议通常缺乏直接解决社会风险因素或减轻这些风险对高血压管理影响的具体指导。当指南提到具体的社会因素时,患者的财务安全是最常见的。随着时间的推移,高血压指南越来越多地纳入了更多关于 SDH 的信息。

结论

许多高血压指南都包含有关 SDH 的信息,但很少有指南为临床医生或卫生系统提供明确的指导,说明如何在护理提供的背景下识别和解决社会风险因素。