Suppr超能文献

应用眼前段扫描分析仪、IOLMaster 和眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪进行单次或序贯检查,以检测窄房角。

Single versus sequential testing with scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of narrow angles.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;95(10):1410-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.175869. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) are devices that can screen non-invasively for narrow angles (NAs) and may reduce the need for gonioscopy, especially where the availability of ophthalmologists is limited. When used individually to detect NAs, neither SPAC, AS-OCT nor IOLMaster were able to achieve both high sensitivity and specificity when using gonioscopy as a gold standard.

AIMS

To assess whether sequential testing improves discrimination of NAs over single testing.

METHODS

In a prospective community-based cross-sectional study in Singapore, 2047 phakic right eyes underwent SPAC, IOLMaster and AS-OCT. NA eyes were defined as present when Shaffer scores were 0 or 1 in ≥ 2 quadrants on gonioscopy. Sensitivities and specificities of single and sequential testing were compared.

RESULTS

At a fixed specificity of 95%, sensitivities in detecting NA eyes were 57.8% (95% CI 52.7% to 62.7%) for SPAC, 43.3% (95% CI 38.3% to 48.3%) for IOLMaster and 52.1% (95% CI 46.4% to 57.7%) for AS-OCT. After sequential testing using SPAC followed by AS-OCT, the sensitivity rose to 70.3% (95% CI 65.5% to 74.8%) while specificity remained at 94.3% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.4%), with sensitivity significantly higher than single testing alone (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sequential testing significantly improves the accuracy of detecting NAs and may be useful in screening settings.

摘要

背景

扫描周边前房深度分析仪(SPAC)、IOLMaster 和眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)是可无创筛查窄房角(NA)的设备,可减少对房角镜检查的需求,特别是在眼科医生资源有限的情况下。当单独用于检测 NA 时,SPAC、AS-OCT 和 IOLMaster 均无法达到使用房角镜作为金标准时的高灵敏度和特异性。

目的

评估连续测试是否比单次测试更能提高 NA 的鉴别能力。

方法

在新加坡一项前瞻性社区横断面研究中,对 2047 只有晶状体的右眼进行了 SPAC、IOLMaster 和 AS-OCT 检查。NA 眼的定义为房角镜检查时 Shaffer 评分≥2 象限为 0 或 1。比较了单次和连续测试的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

在固定特异性为 95%的情况下,SPAC 检测 NA 眼的灵敏度为 57.8%(95%CI:52.7%62.7%),IOLMaster 为 43.3%(95%CI:38.3%48.3%),AS-OCT 为 52.1%(95%CI:46.4%57.7%)。使用 SPAC 后序贯 AS-OCT 进行连续测试后,灵敏度提高至 70.3%(95%CI:65.5%74.8%),特异性仍保持在 94.3%(95%CI:93.1%~95.4%),灵敏度明显高于单次测试(p<0.001)。

结论

连续测试显著提高了检测 NA 的准确性,在筛查环境中可能有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验