• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用眼前段扫描分析仪、IOLMaster 和眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪进行单次或序贯检查,以检测窄房角。

Single versus sequential testing with scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of narrow angles.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;95(10):1410-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.175869. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.2009.175869
PMID:21242582
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) are devices that can screen non-invasively for narrow angles (NAs) and may reduce the need for gonioscopy, especially where the availability of ophthalmologists is limited. When used individually to detect NAs, neither SPAC, AS-OCT nor IOLMaster were able to achieve both high sensitivity and specificity when using gonioscopy as a gold standard.

AIMS

To assess whether sequential testing improves discrimination of NAs over single testing.

METHODS

In a prospective community-based cross-sectional study in Singapore, 2047 phakic right eyes underwent SPAC, IOLMaster and AS-OCT. NA eyes were defined as present when Shaffer scores were 0 or 1 in ≥ 2 quadrants on gonioscopy. Sensitivities and specificities of single and sequential testing were compared.

RESULTS

At a fixed specificity of 95%, sensitivities in detecting NA eyes were 57.8% (95% CI 52.7% to 62.7%) for SPAC, 43.3% (95% CI 38.3% to 48.3%) for IOLMaster and 52.1% (95% CI 46.4% to 57.7%) for AS-OCT. After sequential testing using SPAC followed by AS-OCT, the sensitivity rose to 70.3% (95% CI 65.5% to 74.8%) while specificity remained at 94.3% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.4%), with sensitivity significantly higher than single testing alone (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sequential testing significantly improves the accuracy of detecting NAs and may be useful in screening settings.

摘要

背景

扫描周边前房深度分析仪(SPAC)、IOLMaster 和眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)是可无创筛查窄房角(NA)的设备,可减少对房角镜检查的需求,特别是在眼科医生资源有限的情况下。当单独用于检测 NA 时,SPAC、AS-OCT 和 IOLMaster 均无法达到使用房角镜作为金标准时的高灵敏度和特异性。

目的

评估连续测试是否比单次测试更能提高 NA 的鉴别能力。

方法

在新加坡一项前瞻性社区横断面研究中,对 2047 只有晶状体的右眼进行了 SPAC、IOLMaster 和 AS-OCT 检查。NA 眼的定义为房角镜检查时 Shaffer 评分≥2 象限为 0 或 1。比较了单次和连续测试的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

在固定特异性为 95%的情况下,SPAC 检测 NA 眼的灵敏度为 57.8%(95%CI:52.7%62.7%),IOLMaster 为 43.3%(95%CI:38.3%48.3%),AS-OCT 为 52.1%(95%CI:46.4%57.7%)。使用 SPAC 后序贯 AS-OCT 进行连续测试后,灵敏度提高至 70.3%(95%CI:65.5%74.8%),特异性仍保持在 94.3%(95%CI:93.1%~95.4%),灵敏度明显高于单次测试(p<0.001)。

结论

连续测试显著提高了检测 NA 的准确性,在筛查环境中可能有用。

相似文献

1
Single versus sequential testing with scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of narrow angles.应用眼前段扫描分析仪、IOLMaster 和眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪进行单次或序贯检查,以检测窄房角。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;95(10):1410-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.175869. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
2
Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes.在亚洲人眼中使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描检测原发性闭角型青光眼
Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.073. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
3
Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle.前房角镜检查与眼前节光学相干断层扫描在检测前房角不同象限房角关闭情况中的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):769-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
4
Evaluation of scanning protocols for imaging the anterior chamber angle with anterior segment-optical coherence tomography.眼前节光学相干断层扫描评估眼前房角成像的扫描方案。
J Glaucoma. 2010 Aug;19(6):365-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181bf4dd5.
5
Screening for narrow angles in the singapore population: evaluation of new noncontact screening methods.新加坡人群窄角筛查:新型非接触式筛查方法的评估
Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1720-7, 1727.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 May 16.
6
Comparison of EyeCam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting angle closure.眼相机与眼前节光学相干断层扫描对视路关闭的检测比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;90(8):e621-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02510.x. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
7
Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure.扫描周边前房深度分析仪与改良van Herick分级系统在闭角评估中的比较
Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.019. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
8
Quantitative iris parameters and association with narrow angles.定量虹膜参数与窄角的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
9
Comparison of slitlamp optical coherence tomography and scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer to evaluate angle closure in Asian eyes.比较裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描和扫描周边前房深度分析仪以评估亚洲人眼睛的房角关闭情况。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 May;127(5):599-603. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.41.
10
Modified dark room provocative test for primary angle closure.原发性闭角型青光眼的改良暗室激发试验。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Mar;21(3):155-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820bd215.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of angle parameters by ASOCT and biometric parameters by optical biometer in eyes with occludable angles and open angles.应用扫频光学相干断层扫描仪(ASOCT)估计闭角眼和开角眼的角度参数,应用光学生物测量仪估计生物参数。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 27;44(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03086-w.
2
Anterior Segment OCT for Detection of Narrow Angles: A Community-Based Diagnostic Accuracy Study.眼前节 OCT 对窄角的检测:一项基于社区的诊断准确性研究。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Mar-Apr;7(2):148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT vs gonioscopy for detecting angle closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
超声生物显微镜(AS-OCT)与房角镜诊断闭角型青光眼的准确性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05271-4. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review.前房角评估技术:综述
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):3814. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123814.
5
Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma.用于识别原发性闭角型青光眼高危人群的非接触式检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;5(5):CD012947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012947.pub2.
6
Five-year incidence of angle closure among glaucoma health examination participants.青光眼健康检查参与者中闭角型青光眼的 5 年发病率。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;251(4):1219-28. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2179-1. Epub 2012 Oct 25.