Suppr超能文献

器械顺序效应:使用口腔健康影响量表49和简短健康调查问卷12。

Instrument-order effects: using the Oral Health Impact Profile 49 and the Short Form 12.

作者信息

Kieffer Jacobien Marije, Verrips Gijsbert Hendrik Willem, Hoogstraten Johan

机构信息

Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Feb;119(1):69-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00796.x.

Abstract

Whereas it is well known that the ordering of items can influence research outcomes considerably, very little literature addresses instrument-order effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing the administrative order of the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 (OHIP-49). It was hypothesized that if the SF-12 was administered first, the results would show poorer scores on the SF-12 subscales, as responses would not be restrained to only the oral impacts described by the OHIP-49. Using the Mann-Whitney U-test no significant instrument-order effects were found, except for the Psychological discomfort scale of the OHIP-49, where subjects scored higher when receiving the OHIP-49 first. However, the effect size was negligible (-0.08). These results suggest that no instrument-order effects occurred. Nonetheless, more research dealing with different instruments is needed. This study was performed within a dental setting and we recommend that instrument-order effects should be studied outside this domain.

摘要

众所周知,项目的排序会对研究结果产生相当大的影响,但很少有文献探讨问卷顺序效应。因此,本研究的目的是评估改变简短健康调查问卷12项版(SF - 12)和口腔健康影响程度量表49项版(OHIP - 49)施测顺序的影响。研究假设,如果先施测SF - 12,其分量表得分会更低,因为回答不会仅局限于OHIP - 49所描述的口腔影响。使用曼 - 惠特尼U检验,未发现显著的问卷顺序效应,OHIP - 49的心理不适分量表除外,在该分量表中,先接受OHIP - 49测试的受试者得分更高。然而,效应量可忽略不计(-0.08)。这些结果表明未出现问卷顺序效应。尽管如此,仍需要更多针对不同问卷的研究。本研究是在牙科环境中进行的,我们建议应在该领域之外研究问卷顺序效应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验