Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;168(3):257-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050695. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of specific personality disorder comorbidity on the course of major depressive disorder in a nationally representative sample.
Data were drawn from 1,996 participants in a national survey. Participants who met criteria for major depressive disorder at baseline in face-to-face interviews (in 2001-2002) were reinterviewed 3 years later (in 2004-2005) to determine persistence and recurrence. Predictors included all DSM-IV personality disorders. Control variables included demographic characteristics, other axis I disorders, family and treatment histories, and previously established predictors of the course of major depressive disorder.
A total of 15.1% of participants had persistent major depressive disorder, and 7.3% of those who remitted had a recurrence. Univariate analyses indicated that avoidant, borderline, histrionic, paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal personality disorders all elevated the risk for persistence. With axis I comorbidity controlled, all personality disorders except histrionic personality disorder remained significant. With all other personality disorders controlled, borderline and schizotypal disorders remained significant predictors. In final, multivariate analyses that controlled for age at onset of major depressive disorder, the number of previous episodes, duration of the current episode, family history, and treatment, borderline personality disorder remained a robust predictor of major depressive disorder persistence. Neither personality disorders nor other clinical variables predicted recurrence.
In this nationally representative sample of adults with major depressive disorder, borderline personality disorder robustly predicted persistence, a finding that converges with recent clinical studies. Personality psychopathology, particularly borderline personality disorder, should be assessed in all patients with major depressive disorder, considered in prognosis, and addressed in treatment.
本研究旨在考察特定人格障碍共病对全国代表性样本中重度抑郁症病程的影响。
数据来自一项全国性调查的 1996 名参与者。在面对面访谈中(2001-2002 年)符合重度抑郁障碍标准的基线参与者在 3 年后(2004-2005 年)接受了重新访谈,以确定持续性和复发性。预测因素包括所有 DSM-IV 人格障碍。控制变量包括人口统计学特征、其他轴 I 障碍、家庭和治疗史,以及重度抑郁障碍病程的先前确定的预测因素。
共有 15.1%的参与者存在持续性重度抑郁障碍,缓解者中有 7.3%复发。单变量分析表明,回避型、边缘型、表演型、偏执型、分裂样和分裂型人格障碍均增加了持续性的风险。在控制了轴 I 共病后,除表演型人格障碍外,所有人格障碍均有意义。在控制了所有其他人格障碍后,边缘型和分裂样障碍仍然是显著的预测因素。在最终的多变量分析中,控制了重度抑郁障碍的发病年龄、之前发作的次数、当前发作的持续时间、家族史和治疗,边缘型人格障碍仍然是重度抑郁障碍持续性的强有力预测因素。人格障碍和其他临床变量均未预测复发。
在这项具有全国代表性的成年重度抑郁障碍样本中,边缘型人格障碍是持续性的有力预测因素,这一发现与最近的临床研究一致。人格心理病理学,特别是边缘型人格障碍,应在所有重度抑郁障碍患者中进行评估,考虑到预后,并在治疗中处理。