• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估转录中的人际动机(AIMIT):一种新的检测心理治疗中人际动机系统的方法的跨评定者和内评定者信度研究。

Assessment of Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts (AIMIT): an inter- and intra-rater reliability study of a new method of detection of interpersonal motivational systems in psychotherapy.

机构信息

Associazione per la Ricerca in Psicopatologia dell'Attaccamento e dello Sviluppo-ARPAS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):224-34. doi: 10.1002/cpp.742. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.742
PMID:21246664
Abstract

Assessing Interpersonal Motivations in Transcripts (AIMIT) is a coding system aiming to systematically detect the activity of interpersonal motivational systems (IMS) in the therapeutic dialogue. An inter- and intra-rater reliability study has been conducted. Sixteen video-recorded psychotherapy sessions were selected and transcribed according to the AIMIT criteria. Sessions relate to 16 patients with an Axis II diagnosis, with a mean Global Assessment of Functioning of 51. For the intra-rater reliability evaluation, five sessions have been selected and assigned to five independent coders who where asked to make a first evaluation, and then a second independent one 14 days later. For the inter-rater reliability study, the sessions coded by the therapist-coder were jointly revised with another coder and finally classified as gold standard. The 16 standard sessions were sent to other evaluators for the independent coding. The agreement (κ) was estimated according to the following parameters for each coding unit: evaluation units supported by the 'codable' activation of one or more IMS; motivational interaction with reference to the ongoing relation between patient and therapist; an interaction between the patient and another person reported/narrated by the patient; detection of specific IMS: attachment (At), caregiving (CG), rank (Ra), sexuality (Se), peer cooperation (PC); and transitions from one IMS to another were also scored. The intra-rater agreement was evaluated through the parameters 'cod', 'At', 'CG', 'Ra', 'Se' and 'PC' described above. A total of 2443 coding units were analysed. For the nine parameters on which the agreement was calculated, eight ['coded (Cod)', 'ongoing relation (Rel)', 'narrated relation (Nar)', 'At', 'CG', 'Ra', 'Se' and 'PC'] have κ values comprised between 0.62 (CG) and 0.81 (Cod) and were therefore satisfactory. The scoring of 'transitions' showed agreement values slightly below desired cut-off (0.56). Intra-rater reliability was very good (κ values for Cod = 0.90; κ for all IMS = 0.78). Data seem to support the validity of the AIMIT method in terms of reliability, and encourage to further implementation of the AIMIT approach.

摘要

评估转录中的人际动机 (AIMIT) 是一种旨在系统地检测治疗对话中人际动机系统 (IMS) 活动的编码系统。已经进行了一项内部和外部可靠性研究。选择了 16 个视频记录的心理治疗会话并根据 AIMIT 标准进行了转录。这些会话涉及 16 名具有轴 II 诊断的患者,平均总体功能评估为 51。对于内部评估者的可靠性评估,选择了五个会话并分配给五个独立的评估者,要求他们进行第一次评估,然后在 14 天后进行第二次独立评估。对于外部评估者的可靠性研究,治疗师评估者对会话进行编码,并与另一位评估者共同修订,最终被分类为黄金标准。将这 16 个标准会话发送给其他评估者进行独立编码。根据以下参数,为每个编码单元估计了协议(κ):评估单元由一个或多个 IMS 的“可编码”激活支持;参考患者与治疗师之间正在进行的关系的动机交互;患者与患者报告/叙述的另一个人之间的交互;检测特定的 IMS:依恋 (At)、关怀 (CG)、等级 (Ra)、性 (Se)、同伴合作 (PC);以及从一个 IMS 到另一个 IMS 的转换也被评分。内部评估者的协议通过上述“编码(Cod)”、“正在进行的关系(Rel)”、“叙述的关系(Nar)”、“At”、“CG”、“Ra”、“Se”和“PC”等参数进行评估。共分析了 2443 个编码单元。对于计算协议的九个参数,八个参数 ['编码 (Cod)'] 具有介于 0.62(CG)和 0.81(Cod)之间的 κ 值,因此令人满意。“转换”的评分显示出稍低于所需截止值的协议值(0.56)。内部评估者的可靠性非常好(Cod 的 κ 值=0.90;所有 IMS 的 κ 值=0.78)。数据似乎支持 AIMIT 方法在可靠性方面的有效性,并鼓励进一步实施 AIMIT 方法。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts (AIMIT): an inter- and intra-rater reliability study of a new method of detection of interpersonal motivational systems in psychotherapy.评估转录中的人际动机(AIMIT):一种新的检测心理治疗中人际动机系统的方法的跨评定者和内评定者信度研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):224-34. doi: 10.1002/cpp.742. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
2
A Content Validity Study of AIMIT (Assessing Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts).AIMIT(评估成绩单中的人际动机)的内容效度研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Jul;23(4):319-28. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1960. Epub 2015 May 20.
3
Harmony of transitions in Assessing Interpersonal Motivations in Transcripts analysis can discriminate between Adult Attachment Interview secure and disorganized individuals.在抄本分析中评估人际动机时,过渡的协调性能够区分成人依恋访谈中的安全型和混乱型个体。
Riv Psichiatr. 2017 May-Jun;52(3):117-119. doi: 10.1708/2722.27763.
4
Coding counsellor behaviour in motivational interviewing sessions: inter-rater reliability for the Swedish Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI).动机性访谈环节中编码咨询顾问行为:瑞典动机性访谈治疗完整性编码(MITI)的评分者间信度
Cogn Behav Ther. 2007;36(3):162-9. doi: 10.1080/16506070701339887.
5
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
6
Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.健康受试者膝关节松弛度测量仪器的可重复性
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 May;45(5):595-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei243. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
7
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.工作相关活动评估之体力操作部分的组内和组间信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1797-804. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.548896. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
8
Reliability and applicability of the ICF in coding problems, resources and goals of persons with multiple injuries.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》在对多处受伤者的问题、资源及目标进行编码时的可靠性与适用性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):98-106. doi: 10.1080/09638280701216862.
9
Inter-rater reliability of the French version of the core index for melancholia.忧郁症核心指数法语版的评分者间信度。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Oct;88(2):193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.07.004.
10
Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method.睡眠周期交替模式(CAP)评分的评分者间信度及一种新的计算机辅助CAP评分方法的验证
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.021. Epub 2004 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiating self-disclosure interventions from self-involving interventions based on the assessment of the short-term therapeutic effects: preliminary results.基于短期治疗效果评估区分自我表露干预与自我卷入干预:初步结果
Res Psychother. 2025 Mar 31;28(1). doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2025.800. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Cooperation within the therapeutic relationship improves metacognitive functioning: preliminary findings.治疗关系中的合作可改善元认知功能:初步研究结果。
Res Psychother. 2023 Nov 8;26(3):712. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.712.
3
Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Motivational Systems Questionnaire (IMS-Q).
人际动机系统问卷(IMS-Q)的开发与验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;13(9):784. doi: 10.3390/bs13090784.
4
INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial--the INCA study protocol.参与乳腺癌患者的肿瘤学咨询:一项多中心随机对照试验——INCA 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002266.