• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际动机系统问卷(IMS-Q)的开发与验证

Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Motivational Systems Questionnaire (IMS-Q).

作者信息

Esposito Rosario, Prevete Stefania, Esposito Concetta, Bacchini Dario

机构信息

School of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), 80122 Naples, Italy.

Department of Humanities, University of Naples "Federico II", 80133 Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;13(9):784. doi: 10.3390/bs13090784.

DOI:10.3390/bs13090784
PMID:37754062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525080/
Abstract

Framed within the evolutionary framework, the Interpersonal Motivational System (IMS) theory suggests that eight distinct motivational impulses drive interpersonal human relationships, namely caregiving, social affiliation, attachment, rank-dominance, rank-submission, social play, cooperation, and sexuality. This theory has been widely applied in clinical practice, where psychopathology is viewed as the result of non-flexible or excessive activation of one system over another. Despite its clinical relevance, empirical studies aimed at measuring IMSs are scarce. This paper contributed to filling this gap by proposing a questionnaire to measure individuals' activation of the eight IMSs. Two studies involving large samples of adults were conducted. The first study (N = 455; 76.5% females) concerned the development of the questionnaire and examination of its content validity through explorative factor analysis. In the second study (N = 635; 54.8% females), confirmatory factor analyses were performed to further refine and confirm the instrument's factor structure. The final version consisted of 50 items. Empirical validity was established by investigating the correlations between the eight IMSs and other related measures (i.e., personality traits, human basic values, and attachment dimensions). The findings suggest that the IMS framework can be used to understand individual differences in motivation and behavior in different social contexts.

摘要

在进化框架内,人际动机系统(IMS)理论表明,有八种不同的动机冲动驱动着人际间的人际关系,即关爱、社会归属感、依恋、等级主导、等级服从、社交游戏、合作和性。该理论已在临床实践中广泛应用,在临床实践中,精神病理学被视为一个系统相对于另一个系统的不灵活或过度激活的结果。尽管其具有临床相关性,但旨在测量人际动机系统的实证研究却很少。本文通过提出一份问卷来测量个体对八种人际动机系统的激活情况,为填补这一空白做出了贡献。进行了两项涉及大量成年人样本的研究。第一项研究(N = 455;76.5%为女性)涉及问卷的编制以及通过探索性因素分析对其内容效度进行检验。在第二项研究(N = 635;54.8%为女性)中,进行了验证性因素分析,以进一步完善和确认该工具的因素结构。最终版本由50个项目组成。通过调查八种人际动机系统与其他相关测量指标(即人格特质、人类基本价值观和依恋维度)之间的相关性,确立了实证效度。研究结果表明,人际动机系统框架可用于理解不同社会背景下动机和行为的个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/10525080/b44c6bda6d32/behavsci-13-00784-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/10525080/b44c6bda6d32/behavsci-13-00784-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7f8/10525080/b44c6bda6d32/behavsci-13-00784-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Motivational Systems Questionnaire (IMS-Q).人际动机系统问卷(IMS-Q)的开发与验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;13(9):784. doi: 10.3390/bs13090784.
2
A Content Validity Study of AIMIT (Assessing Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts).AIMIT(评估成绩单中的人际动机)的内容效度研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Jul;23(4):319-28. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1960. Epub 2015 May 20.
3
Assessment of Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts (AIMIT): an inter- and intra-rater reliability study of a new method of detection of interpersonal motivational systems in psychotherapy.评估转录中的人际动机(AIMIT):一种新的检测心理治疗中人际动机系统的方法的跨评定者和内评定者信度研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):224-34. doi: 10.1002/cpp.742. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
4
[Validation study of the Depressive Experience Questionnaire].《抑郁体验问卷的效度研究》
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):445-55.
5
Harmony of transitions in Assessing Interpersonal Motivations in Transcripts analysis can discriminate between Adult Attachment Interview secure and disorganized individuals.在抄本分析中评估人际动机时,过渡的协调性能够区分成人依恋访谈中的安全型和混乱型个体。
Riv Psichiatr. 2017 May-Jun;52(3):117-119. doi: 10.1708/2722.27763.
6
[French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].[TASTE(能力与评估测试)的法语版本]
Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):527-38.
7
Development and validation of the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Problems.人际关系问题的环量表的发展与验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 May;30(5):594-609. doi: 10.1037/pas0000505. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Assessing Anaclitic and Introjective Characteristics Using the SWAP-200 Q-Sort: Concurrent Validity with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex Scales.使用 SWAP-200 Q 分类评估反映性和内摄性特征:与人际关系问题清单双相环量表的同时效度。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):932-941. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2057. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
9
Predisposing and Motivational Factors Related to Social Network Sites Use: Systematic Review.与社交网站使用相关的诱发因素和动机因素:系统评价
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jun 9;3(2):e12248. doi: 10.2196/12248.
10
[French validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA) and experience of close relationships with students and perpetrators of domestic violence].[《性侵犯现代神话接受量表》(AMMSA)的法语验证以及与学生和家庭暴力施暴者亲密关系的体验]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):554-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A general motivational architecture for human and animal personality.人类和动物个性的一般动机架构。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Jan;144:104967. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104967. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
Helping and Cooperation at 14 Months of Age.14个月大时的帮助与合作。
Infancy. 2007 May;11(3):271-294. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00227.x. Epub 2007 May 1.
3
The Two-Dimensional Model of Behavioral Systems and the "Problematic" Activation Style.行为系统的二维模型与“问题”激活方式。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Feb;125(1):294-309. doi: 10.1177/0033294120973938. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Cooperation in psychotherapy increases metacognitive abilities: a single-case study.心理治疗中的合作能提高元认知能力:一项单案例研究。
Riv Psichiatr. 2018 Nov-Dec;53(6):336-340. doi: 10.1708/3084.30768.
5
From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development.从需要到目标再到表现:动机、个性和发展的统一理论基础。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;124(6):689-719. doi: 10.1037/rev0000082. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
A Content Validity Study of AIMIT (Assessing Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts).AIMIT(评估成绩单中的人际动机)的内容效度研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2016 Jul;23(4):319-28. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1960. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
When sex goes wrong: a behavioral systems perspective on individual differences in sexual attitudes, motives, feelings, and behaviors.当性出现问题时:从行为系统角度看性态度、动机、情感及行为的个体差异
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 May;106(5):822-42. doi: 10.1037/a0036021.
8
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
9
Mentalizing, motivation, and social mentalities: theoretical considerations and implications for psychotherapy.心理化、动机和社会心理:理论思考及其对心理治疗的影响。
Psychol Psychother. 2011 Mar;84(1):9-25; discussion 98-110. doi: 10.1348/147608310X520094.
10
Origins of human cooperation and morality.人类合作与道德的起源。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:231-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812. Epub 2012 Jul 12.